Being and Seeing: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
m (moved Being and Seeing, From Freud to the Building Sites, a Woman's Journey into the Male Psyche to Being and Seeing: I don't think anyone is going to type the whole thing, or link to it)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
An academic perspective on the world of men according to [[Michaela Carapadis]].  
'''Being and Seeing, From Freud to the Building Sites, a Woman's Journey into the Male Psyche''' is an academic perspective on the world of men according to [[Michaela Carapadis]].
 
=== Being and seeing ===


== Being and seeing ==
Table of contents
Table of contents


<u>Chapter 1</u>  
<u>Chapter 1</u>: Roofer
*Micheala as a roofer
*Steelworker, Pittsburgh
*Steelworker, Pittsburg
*Policeman
*Policeman


*Untrained brainsurgeon.
*Untrained brain surgeon.
These other chapters are mentioned vaguely, however Michaela does not say the order or numbers of these chapters.
These other chapters are mentioned vaguely, however Michaela does not say the order or numbers of these chapters.


Michaela states details during her interview with [[Amy Sheckenhausen]], presumably from her book. It is strongly suspected Michaela's books is an outlet to express her radical views on men instead of the soul reason of academia purposes.
Michaela states details during her interview with [[Amy Sheckenhausen]], presumably from her book. It is strongly suspected Michaela's books is an outlet to express her radical views on men instead of the soul reason of academia purposes.
[[Category:Media]]

Latest revision as of 19:40, 17 February 2011

Being and Seeing, From Freud to the Building Sites, a Woman's Journey into the Male Psyche is an academic perspective on the world of men according to Michaela Carapadis.

Being and seeing

Table of contents

Chapter 1: Roofer

  • Steelworker, Pittsburgh
  • Policeman
  • Untrained brain surgeon.

These other chapters are mentioned vaguely, however Michaela does not say the order or numbers of these chapters.

Michaela states details during her interview with Amy Sheckenhausen, presumably from her book. It is strongly suspected Michaela's books is an outlet to express her radical views on men instead of the soul reason of academia purposes.