Difference between revisions of "Forum:Wouldn't Capitol City make a good GTA 5"

From Grand Theft Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 15: Line 15:
 
What do you think?
 
What do you think?
 
--[[User:Gta's-Bitch|Gta's-Bitch]] 00:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Gta's-Bitch|Gta's-Bitch]] 00:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
Well, I'm firmly against GTAs using past protagonists again (just cheap, lazy and wrong), and considering IV and the III era take place in presumably different canons, the III canon which had just been abandoned, revisiting the III era for V seems unlikely. And travelling between two large regions (D.C is too small for a whole city, but Virginia and Maryland additions would be great additions that wouldn't function as standalone games) would be extremely hard for the developers. [[User:GeneralGoose|GeneralGoose]] 14:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:59, 16 April 2009

Forums GTA Wouldn't Capitol City make a good GTA 5

I think Capitol City is a good place for GTA 5 . Who agrees with me?

Washington DC I presume? If so, you are correct. And why stop at just D.C? Why not do Maryland (in particular Baltimore) and Virginia as well? Maybe even West Virginia and Delaware? GeneralGoose 19:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Doubt it highly doubt it there gonna stay in the GTA world for now Like Vice City,San Andreas, Liberty City, and maybe Carcer City but in the future they should make and develope new cities counties ect.--Roman bellic 00:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

If so, GTA will quickly become dull and repetitive. The new SA and VC, if they come, would be fun and all, but in all honesty: if they just end up redoing LC, SA and VC, one of GTA's strong points, the cities, will soon turn into a series weakness. London and the DC region have so much potential, even though parts of the DC region in particular will need a bit of extra crime in their GTA rendition. GeneralGoose 04:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

They should just create more cities to be honest because those cities above have been with them for a while now and they should continue the stories games for entertainment because R* has been quiet with big games as of late with acceptions to TLAD and Chinatown wars but thats not a benifit to people who do not have a Ds. So improvements to the future-more cities more shot games--Roman bellic 23:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

I think Gta 5 should be SanAndreas 2 , you still get to bet Cj but there are new friends to be made ect , and you even get a mobile phone and stuff to use. they could even keep the camera and gym ect but in a different country. oor you could fly to a different country like your saying D.C , missions in SanAndreas and D.C

What do you think? --Gta's-Bitch 00:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm firmly against GTAs using past protagonists again (just cheap, lazy and wrong), and considering IV and the III era take place in presumably different canons, the III canon which had just been abandoned, revisiting the III era for V seems unlikely. And travelling between two large regions (D.C is too small for a whole city, but Virginia and Maryland additions would be great additions that wouldn't function as standalone games) would be extremely hard for the developers. GeneralGoose 14:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC)