Talk:Bucanneer: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 13:04, 3 May 2009

Isn't it Buccaneer? Zaibatsu 20:20, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Name was changed slightly in GTA IV. Thevictor390 17:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Merge

Merge it with Bucccaneer!

I think the disambiguation link works well enough; they are technically different cars. Thevictor390 17:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

That's just retarded. I don't suppose you want to do the same for the PCJ-600 article because the name of the GTA IV version lacks a dash, like the NRG 900? - ZS 09:21, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Merge again

A merge is clearly in order, for the same reason I'm pushing to merge contents of Mesa into Mesa Grande. Since other articles aren't following this practice of split articles, it's time for some consistency. - ZS 18:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree, the car is clearly the same as the GTA SA variant, its completely pointless seperating articles because of what is quite clearly a spelling mistake by rockstar. Hbriz 23:05, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 == Merge again ==
-A merge is clearly in order, for the same reason I'm pushing to merge contents of [[Talk:Mesa|Mesa]] in [[Mesa Grande]]. Since other articles aren't following this practice of split articles, it's time for some consistency. - [[User:ZS|ZS]] 18:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
+A merge is clearly in order, for the same reason I'm pushing to merge contents of [[Talk:Mesa|Mesa]] into [[Mesa Grande]]. Since other articles aren't following this practice of split articles, it's time for some consistency. - [[User:ZS|ZS]] 18:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 :I agree, the car is clearly the same as the GTA SA variant, its completely pointless seperating articles because of what is quite clearly a spelling mistake by rockstar. [[User:Hbriz|Hbriz]] 23:05, 2 May 2009 (UTC)