Talk:Do You Have Protection?: Difference between revisions
(wat) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Since I was rv'd, would someone like to explain how the article needs cleanup? It's clear, it's concise, it provides a good amount of information and it's easy to read. Save for piping, this is one of the better articles, from a literary standpoint. [[User:That Thing There|That Thing There]] 19:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | Since I was rv'd, would someone like to explain how the article needs cleanup? It's clear, it's concise, it provides a good amount of information and it's easy to read. Save for piping, this is one of the better articles, from a literary standpoint. [[User:That Thing There|That Thing There]] 19:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:It's in need of cleanup, beacuse it's written like a walkthrough - mission articles are supposed to just describe; who gives the mission, what happens during the mission, and what the reward is. There's also the extensive use of 'you', which should, instead, be 'the player' or 'Niko'. I ''do'' agree that it's clear and easy to read, but I'm merely following GTA Wiki's [[Grand Theft Wiki:Cleanup|Policy]] | |||
Revision as of 22:17, 19 March 2009
Since I was rv'd, would someone like to explain how the article needs cleanup? It's clear, it's concise, it provides a good amount of information and it's easy to read. Save for piping, this is one of the better articles, from a literary standpoint. That Thing There 19:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- It's in need of cleanup, beacuse it's written like a walkthrough - mission articles are supposed to just describe; who gives the mission, what happens during the mission, and what the reward is. There's also the extensive use of 'you', which should, instead, be 'the player' or 'Niko'. I do agree that it's clear and easy to read, but I'm merely following GTA Wiki's Policy