Talk:Era: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 86: Line 86:


::Thank you for taking the time to explain everything.--[[User:Loadingue|Loadingue]] ([[User talk:Loadingue|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Loadingue|edits]]) 06:56, 2 May 2013 (BST)
::Thank you for taking the time to explain everything.--[[User:Loadingue|Loadingue]] ([[User talk:Loadingue|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Loadingue|edits]]) 06:56, 2 May 2013 (BST)
I agree with you there. The word era is not perfect, but we have looked at several others (series, generation etc) but era was the best fit (and the shortest). Era still fits though - each new numbered game has started a group of similar games for a period of time until the next numbered game (although the GTA III Era lasted a long time and had lots of differences, it still had a lot of similarities and doesn't break the system). If there is a better way to group games, I'm open to it, but I think Eras+Universes cover everything we need to group. [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 22:13, 2 May 2013 (BST)