Template talk:Current: Difference between revisions
(Current Events or Current Affairs?) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Shouldn't this be called "Current Events" instead of "Current Affairs"? Not that I am complaining. Just wondering, that's all. --[[User:Chief of Staff|Legion]] 04:33, 29 April 2007 (BST) | Shouldn't this be called "Current Events" instead of "Current Affairs"? Not that I am complaining. Just wondering, that's all. --[[User:Chief of Staff|Legion]] 04:33, 29 April 2007 (BST) | ||
:The template does say "current events" - but if you mean the category, yes that should be "current events" too. I'll change. [[User:Xenon|Xenon]] ([[Sysop|Admin]]) [[User talk:Xenon|talk]] 15:13, 29 April 2007 (BST) | |||
::Oops, I was meaning to refer to category, not the template itself, so yeah. I guess I was writing the above thing when I was so dead sleepy. ;D --[[User:Chief of Staff|Legion]] 20:30, 29 April 2007 (BST) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:30, 29 April 2007
Current Events or Current Affairs?
Shouldn't this be called "Current Events" instead of "Current Affairs"? Not that I am complaining. Just wondering, that's all. --Legion 04:33, 29 April 2007 (BST)
- The template does say "current events" - but if you mean the category, yes that should be "current events" too. I'll change. Xenon (Admin) talk 15:13, 29 April 2007 (BST)
- Oops, I was meaning to refer to category, not the template itself, so yeah. I guess I was writing the above thing when I was so dead sleepy. ;D --Legion 20:30, 29 April 2007 (BST)