Community talk:Hub - Revision history

Gboyers: /* Returning Characters in GTA V */

2013-09-12T08:24:01Z

Returning Characters in GTA V

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 12 September 2013
Line 352:		Line 352:

	I'm not sure why there are 2 pages for Jock Cranley. In my post on the [[Talk:Jock Cranley (GTA V)\|talk page]] I explained that they are almost certainly the same character. Now another GTA III Era actor has returned: [[Jack Howitzer]] had a [http://www.lifeinvader.com/profile/jackhowitzer Lifeinvader profile]. I think that we shouldn't create different pages for the same character.--[[User:Hehe5\|Hehe5]] ([[User talk:Hehe5\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Hehe5\|edits]]) 09:12, 12 September 2013 (BST)		I'm not sure why there are 2 pages for Jock Cranley. In my post on the [[Talk:Jock Cranley (GTA V)\|talk page]] I explained that they are almost certainly the same character. Now another GTA III Era actor has returned: [[Jack Howitzer]] had a [http://www.lifeinvader.com/profile/jackhowitzer Lifeinvader profile]. I think that we shouldn't create different pages for the same character.--[[User:Hehe5\|Hehe5]] ([[User talk:Hehe5\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Hehe5\|edits]]) 09:12, 12 September 2013 (BST)

			:I agree entirely. It is possible that they are a slightly 'reimagined' character with more background and some new details, but just like we do for vehicles, we should list it on the same page unless there is evidence that he is a completely separate person. [[User:Gboyers\|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers\|talk]]</sup> 09:24, 12 September 2013 (BST)

Hehe5: /* Returning Characters in GTA V */ New discussion

2013-09-12T08:12:54Z

Returning Characters in GTA V: New discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:12, 12 September 2013
Line 348:		Line 348:

	:Also, having suggestions accepted or rejected is nothing to do with being staff, please don't suggest that. It's true that amongst the staff we have had many discussions about eras, but in the end we've always decided to stick with them. The reason I confidently answer your question is because we've had these discussions many times, and there's still no evidence to suggest it's a bad system or somehow wrong. I'm always happy to have these discussions - that's what makes this wiki what it is, and that's how we've made thousands of decisions over the years. This is all part of the wiki collaboration process! [[User:Gboyers\|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers\|talk]]</sup> 07:42, 24 April 2012 (UTC)		:Also, having suggestions accepted or rejected is nothing to do with being staff, please don't suggest that. It's true that amongst the staff we have had many discussions about eras, but in the end we've always decided to stick with them. The reason I confidently answer your question is because we've had these discussions many times, and there's still no evidence to suggest it's a bad system or somehow wrong. I'm always happy to have these discussions - that's what makes this wiki what it is, and that's how we've made thousands of decisions over the years. This is all part of the wiki collaboration process! [[User:Gboyers\|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers\|talk]]</sup> 07:42, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

			== Returning Characters in GTA V ==

			I'm not sure why there are 2 pages for Jock Cranley. In my post on the [[Talk:Jock Cranley (GTA V)\|talk page]] I explained that they are almost certainly the same character. Now another GTA III Era actor has returned: [[Jack Howitzer]] had a [http://www.lifeinvader.com/profile/jackhowitzer Lifeinvader profile]. I think that we shouldn't create different pages for the same character.--[[User:Hehe5\|Hehe5]] ([[User talk:Hehe5\|talk]]\|[[Special:Contributions/Hehe5\|edits]]) 09:12, 12 September 2013 (BST)

A-Dust at 10:52, 5 February 2013

2013-02-05T10:52:53Z

What changes will this make?

Gboyers: Removing unused images

2012-05-24T05:19:45Z

Removing unused images

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:19, 24 May 2012
Line 188:		Line 188:
	:Works for me. Its possible that our servers were just being slow when they were creating those thumbnails. [[File:GtaWikiNonBrokenScreenshot.png\|thumb\|works for me]] --[[User:Uberfuzzy\|Uberfuzzy]]<staff /> 19:23, August 3, 2010 (UTC)		:Works for me. Its possible that our servers were just being slow when they were creating those thumbnails. [[File:GtaWikiNonBrokenScreenshot.png\|thumb\|works for me]] --[[User:Uberfuzzy\|Uberfuzzy]]<staff /> 19:23, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

	::I don't seem to have any problems with the image in FX and Chrome, but in IE7 the images seem to not appear depending on the size of the window.		::I don't seem to have any problems with the image in FX and Chrome, but in IE7 the images seem to not appear depending on the size of the window. --'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|spaceeinstein]]''' 20:38, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
	~~::[[File:Odd1.jpg\|250px]][[File:Odd2.jpg\|250px]]~~--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|spaceeinstein]]''' 20:38, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
	::Well, I tried a couple of solutions I've seen around the internet. I tried deleting cookies from this site, and checking the firewall, making sure all images load automatically, but it's still not there. Now, if I log out, I can see them (at least on FCR-900, since we seem to be using that for reference now), but logging in they're not there anymore. I looked around in my preferences but nothing seems to indicate why this happens. I even tried increasing image size limit but it didn't fix the issue. Hope that info helps. [[User:Vhazhiphor\|Vhazhiphor]] 01:50, August 4, 2010 (UTC)		::Well, I tried a couple of solutions I've seen around the internet. I tried deleting cookies from this site, and checking the firewall, making sure all images load automatically, but it's still not there. Now, if I log out, I can see them (at least on FCR-900, since we seem to be using that for reference now), but logging in they're not there anymore. I looked around in my preferences but nothing seems to indicate why this happens. I even tried increasing image size limit but it didn't fix the issue. Hope that info helps. [[User:Vhazhiphor\|Vhazhiphor]] 01:50, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

Gboyers: /* "Eras" */

2012-04-24T07:42:51Z

"Eras"

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:42, 24 April 2012
Line 342:		Line 342:
	Rockstar has officially said a couple of months ago that there are no eras, but there are universes: The 2D universe (GTA, GTA2), the 3D universe (GTA III - GTA VCS) and the HD universe (GTA IV - GTA V). On the wiki V has its own Era, even if it's fairly obvious from the Trailer that it's set in the IV Universe (some cars are identical to those from IV).		Rockstar has officially said a couple of months ago that there are no eras, but there are universes: The 2D universe (GTA, GTA2), the 3D universe (GTA III - GTA VCS) and the HD universe (GTA IV - GTA V). On the wiki V has its own Era, even if it's fairly obvious from the Trailer that it's set in the IV Universe (some cars are identical to those from IV).
	what I'm asking for is reorganisation of the Era theory, but I know it'll be rejected because I'm not Wiki staff. [[User:Scrab\|Scrab]] ([[User talk:Scrab\|talk]]) 07:22, 24 April 2012 (UTC)		what I'm asking for is reorganisation of the Era theory, but I know it'll be rejected because I'm not Wiki staff. [[User:Scrab\|Scrab]] ([[User talk:Scrab\|talk]]) 07:22, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

			:I've responded to your specific suggestion on [[Talk:GTA IV Era]]. Eras are a grouping system that goes under the universe system - we do use both. Even though GTA V is still within the HD universe (as Rockstar have mentioned), it's still a new era. Even though there are some overlaps (such as vehicles), it's still a new era.

			:The only extra thing I'd point out is that the 2011 trailer is very early, perhaps as early as 2 years before release. This would explain why some GTA IV vehicle models had been re-used, and I would expect those to change somewhat before release. I was with Rockstar at the weekend, and I know they still modify parts of games right up until release, literally until a week or two before. I also know they have working alpha copies of games ''several years'' before release, long before even resemble the final game, and that's why models from previous games are used until new ones are made. The trailers haven't shown us anything to suggest that this is "GTA IV, Part II, Niko's trip across the US" or anything that would make us stick it into the IV era.

			:So whilst there will be similarities and overlaps (vehicles making an appearance, references to the IV storyline) the games won't be paired together (like expansion packs or a Part II), and they are both part of the HD universe, there's nothing to suggest the games are identical or paired or anything that would make us completely throw away the era grouping system. As I explained, the eras are just a grouping system that explain quite well what goes on and which games are ''definitely'' grouped together.

			:Also, having suggestions accepted or rejected is nothing to do with being staff, please don't suggest that. It's true that amongst the staff we have had many discussions about eras, but in the end we've always decided to stick with them. The reason I confidently answer your question is because we've had these discussions many times, and there's still no evidence to suggest it's a bad system or somehow wrong. I'm always happy to have these discussions - that's what makes this wiki what it is, and that's how we've made thousands of decisions over the years. This is all part of the wiki collaboration process! [[User:Gboyers\|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers\|talk]]</sup> 07:42, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Scrab: /* "Eras" */

2012-04-24T07:22:20Z

"Eras"

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 24 April 2012
Line 341:		Line 341:

	Rockstar has officially said a couple of months ago that there are no eras, but there are universes: The 2D universe (GTA, GTA2), the 3D universe (GTA III - GTA VCS) and the HD universe (GTA IV - GTA V). On the wiki V has its own Era, even if it's fairly obvious from the Trailer that it's set in the IV Universe (some cars are identical to those from IV).		Rockstar has officially said a couple of months ago that there are no eras, but there are universes: The 2D universe (GTA, GTA2), the 3D universe (GTA III - GTA VCS) and the HD universe (GTA IV - GTA V). On the wiki V has its own Era, even if it's fairly obvious from the Trailer that it's set in the IV Universe (some cars are identical to those from IV).
	what I'm asking for is reorganisation of the Era theory, but I know it'll be rejected because I'm not Wiki staff.		what I'm asking for is reorganisation of the Era theory, but I know it'll be rejected because I'm not Wiki staff. [[User:Scrab\|Scrab]] ([[User talk:Scrab\|talk]]) 07:22, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Scrab: /* "Eras" */ New discussion

2012-04-24T07:21:59Z

"Eras": New discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:21, 24 April 2012
Line 337:		Line 337:

	I'm not sure where I should post this but, Would it be possible to looking into changing the colour of the links at the very top of every page, as White is not a good colour to be used on the current background? [[User:Clueless93\|Clueless93]] ([[User talk:Clueless93\|talk]]) 10:21, 28 January 2012 (UTC)		I'm not sure where I should post this but, Would it be possible to looking into changing the colour of the links at the very top of every page, as White is not a good colour to be used on the current background? [[User:Clueless93\|Clueless93]] ([[User talk:Clueless93\|talk]]) 10:21, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

			== "Eras" ==

			Rockstar has officially said a couple of months ago that there are no eras, but there are universes: The 2D universe (GTA, GTA2), the 3D universe (GTA III - GTA VCS) and the HD universe (GTA IV - GTA V). On the wiki V has its own Era, even if it's fairly obvious from the Trailer that it's set in the IV Universe (some cars are identical to those from IV).
			what I'm asking for is reorganisation of the Era theory, but I know it'll be rejected because I'm not Wiki staff.

Clueless93: /* Suggestion */ New discussion

2012-01-28T10:21:47Z

Suggestion: New discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:21, 28 January 2012
Line 333:		Line 333:
	::2. Thanks for the suggestion.		::2. Thanks for the suggestion.
	::[[User:Maxaxle\|Maxaxle]] 00:11, 24 September 2011 (BST)		::[[User:Maxaxle\|Maxaxle]] 00:11, 24 September 2011 (BST)

			== Suggestion ==

			I'm not sure where I should post this but, Would it be possible to looking into changing the colour of the links at the very top of every page, as White is not a good colour to be used on the current background? [[User:Clueless93\|Clueless93]] ([[User talk:Clueless93\|talk]]) 10:21, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Gboyers: Reverted edits by NewBalance (talk) to last revision by Maxaxle

2011-09-24T06:05:21Z

Reverted edits by NewBalance (talk) to last revision by Maxaxle

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 24 September 2011
Line 333:		Line 333:
	::2. Thanks for the suggestion.		::2. Thanks for the suggestion.
	::[[User:Maxaxle\|Maxaxle]] 00:11, 24 September 2011 (BST)		::[[User:Maxaxle\|Maxaxle]] 00:11, 24 September 2011 (BST)

	On the outside of the http://www.putonshoes.org/Reebok-Zig-Pulse_9_1.htm is a soft patented leather. This makes it much easier to play in as the feel is much softer and lighter on the http://www.putonshoes.org/Reebok-Zig-Pulse-II_10_1.htm Having a http://www.putonshoes.org/Reebok-Zig-Pulse-II_10_1.htm and good feel on a basketball http://www.putonshoes.org/Reebok-Zig-Pulse-II_10_1.htm is important in any mid top design especially in the http://www.putonshoes.org/Skechers-Christmas-Outlet-shoes_12_1.htm where a lot of weight is attributed to the rubber outsole.

NewBalance at 05:58, 24 September 2011

2011-09-24T05:58:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:58, 24 September 2011
Line 333:		Line 333:
	::2. Thanks for the suggestion.		::2. Thanks for the suggestion.
	::[[User:Maxaxle\|Maxaxle]] 00:11, 24 September 2011 (BST)		::[[User:Maxaxle\|Maxaxle]] 00:11, 24 September 2011 (BST)

			On the outside of the http://www.putonshoes.org/Reebok-Zig-Pulse_9_1.htm is a soft patented leather. This makes it much easier to play in as the feel is much softer and lighter on the http://www.putonshoes.org/Reebok-Zig-Pulse-II_10_1.htm Having a http://www.putonshoes.org/Reebok-Zig-Pulse-II_10_1.htm and good feel on a basketball http://www.putonshoes.org/Reebok-Zig-Pulse-II_10_1.htm is important in any mid top design especially in the http://www.putonshoes.org/Skechers-Christmas-Outlet-shoes_12_1.htm where a lot of weight is attributed to the rubber outsole.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:19, 24 May 2012
Line 188:		Line 188:
	:Works for me. Its possible that our servers were just being slow when they were creating those thumbnails. [[File:GtaWikiNonBrokenScreenshot.png\|thumb\|works for me]] --[[User:Uberfuzzy\|Uberfuzzy]]<staff /> 19:23, August 3, 2010 (UTC)		:Works for me. Its possible that our servers were just being slow when they were creating those thumbnails. [[File:GtaWikiNonBrokenScreenshot.png\|thumb\|works for me]] --[[User:Uberfuzzy\|Uberfuzzy]]<staff /> 19:23, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

	::I don't seem to have any problems with the image in FX and Chrome, but in IE7 the images seem to not appear depending on the size of the window.		::I don't seem to have any problems with the image in FX and Chrome, but in IE7 the images seem to not appear depending on the size of the window. --'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|spaceeinstein]]''' 20:38, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
	~~::[[File:Odd1.jpg\|250px]][[File:Odd2.jpg\|250px]]~~--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|spaceeinstein]]''' 20:38, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
	::Well, I tried a couple of solutions I've seen around the internet. I tried deleting cookies from this site, and checking the firewall, making sure all images load automatically, but it's still not there. Now, if I log out, I can see them (at least on FCR-900, since we seem to be using that for reference now), but logging in they're not there anymore. I looked around in my preferences but nothing seems to indicate why this happens. I even tried increasing image size limit but it didn't fix the issue. Hope that info helps. [[User:Vhazhiphor\|Vhazhiphor]] 01:50, August 4, 2010 (UTC)		::Well, I tried a couple of solutions I've seen around the internet. I tried deleting cookies from this site, and checking the firewall, making sure all images load automatically, but it's still not there. Now, if I log out, I can see them (at least on FCR-900, since we seem to be using that for reference now), but logging in they're not there anymore. I looked around in my preferences but nothing seems to indicate why this happens. I even tried increasing image size limit but it didn't fix the issue. Hope that info helps. [[User:Vhazhiphor\|Vhazhiphor]] 01:50, August 4, 2010 (UTC)