Jump to content

Talk:Victor Vance: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 41: Line 41:


So, why does this article have to be written in such a certain way concerning the death situation? I did my best to make it look non-speculating, but A-Dust reverted it without explanation on the edit summary. It's best to say that the Vance brother was ''possibly'' Vic and that he is indeed not mentioned in the game at any point by name but only on the crime tree of VC's site which doesn't exactly clear up anything either. My 2 cents, besides I don't care what anyone say, I just am tired of being linked to fan-sites and wiki's on forums whenever I'm into this argument. As update, I see you are trying to add "sources" to show what you believe, but honestly you can go and dig up millions of reviews saying Vic is dead or fan sites but none of them actually answer the question. It's like fan-sites and wiki assist together in this to get as many people to believe them and things they say. I'm not saying it's impossible that Vic died but to make it as "fair" as possible to all believers of this theory it's best to just type "possibilities" and "thoughts" as no one is gonna get confused or recommended to believe what this site amongst many other write. And the gamespot source(s) is/are not the best ever to use as it's just reviews. I mean I can also go and write a review on VCS then type throughout that Vic wasn't present in VC, but that doesn't mean it's a fact, it's just what I think on the whole situation. --''[[User talk:GTA4PC|GTA 4 PC]]'' 16:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
So, why does this article have to be written in such a certain way concerning the death situation? I did my best to make it look non-speculating, but A-Dust reverted it without explanation on the edit summary. It's best to say that the Vance brother was ''possibly'' Vic and that he is indeed not mentioned in the game at any point by name but only on the crime tree of VC's site which doesn't exactly clear up anything either. My 2 cents, besides I don't care what anyone say, I just am tired of being linked to fan-sites and wiki's on forums whenever I'm into this argument. As update, I see you are trying to add "sources" to show what you believe, but honestly you can go and dig up millions of reviews saying Vic is dead or fan sites but none of them actually answer the question. It's like fan-sites and wiki assist together in this to get as many people to believe them and things they say. I'm not saying it's impossible that Vic died but to make it as "fair" as possible to all believers of this theory it's best to just type "possibilities" and "thoughts" as no one is gonna get confused or recommended to believe what this site amongst many other write. And the gamespot source(s) is/are not the best ever to use as it's just reviews. I mean I can also go and write a review on VCS then type throughout that Vic wasn't present in VC, but that doesn't mean it's a fact, it's just what I think on the whole situation. --''[[User talk:GTA4PC|GTA 4 PC]]'' 16:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
No i personally do not believe that it is infact Vic. Theres just to many differences between him in VCS and VC. If that guy (in VC) is vic then hes had a serious Meth/Crack addiction, Hes all out of shape, he dont look like Vic, hes accent is different and not to mention the way he easily dies as hes proberbly the best guy with a gun than everyone else in that scene. The only way i can think of is that VC came out first and rockstar may of thought that they wouldnt add another VC game to the series. Saying that it would be really stupid of him to die that easily. As for the easter egg in GTA IV, rockstar added that just as a reference to all the other GTA games for the GTA 3 era.


==Death 2==
==Death 2==
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.