Talk:Hydra - Revision history

Khan1998stevewhite at 17:03, 10 January 2011

2011-01-10T17:03:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 10 January 2011
Line 58:		Line 58:

	:Best in what? Speed? All jets in this game has an upper limit in speed. That means no jet can be faster than another, but acceleration can differ.-'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|spaceeinstein]]''' 19:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)		:Best in what? Speed? All jets in this game has an upper limit in speed. That means no jet can be faster than another, but acceleration can differ.-'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|spaceeinstein]]''' 19:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

			:: But the Hydra goes really slow yet the Shamal goes fast :/ --[[User:Khan1998stevewhite\|Khan1998stevewhite]] 17:03, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Spaceeinstein: /* Best? */

2011-01-09T19:35:17Z

Best?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 9 January 2011
Line 56:		Line 56:

	I (personally) don't think this is the best. Shamals are very fast and have excellent handling, ATs are near Industructable and the StuntPlane has the best Handling. The Hydra hardly moves, it took me 4 minutes to get from the Fort Carson Safehouse to San Fierro Airport whereas in the Shamal it took 1 minute. :/. --[[User:Khan1998stevewhite\|Khan1998stevewhite]] 14:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)		I (personally) don't think this is the best. Shamals are very fast and have excellent handling, ATs are near Industructable and the StuntPlane has the best Handling. The Hydra hardly moves, it took me 4 minutes to get from the Fort Carson Safehouse to San Fierro Airport whereas in the Shamal it took 1 minute. :/. --[[User:Khan1998stevewhite\|Khan1998stevewhite]] 14:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

			:Best in what? Speed? All jets in this game has an upper limit in speed. That means no jet can be faster than another, but acceleration can differ.-'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|spaceeinstein]]''' 19:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Khan1998stevewhite: /* Best? */ new section

2011-01-09T14:34:39Z

Best?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:34, 9 January 2011
Line 52:		Line 52:

	I'm in the Air Force, that's how we number them, but after a two second Google search I came across [http://home.att.net/~jbaugher/navyserials.html this] and suddenly feel very stupid. Apparently the Navy just counts their aircraft for their serial numbers.		I'm in the Air Force, that's how we number them, but after a two second Google search I came across [http://home.att.net/~jbaugher/navyserials.html this] and suddenly feel very stupid. Apparently the Navy just counts their aircraft for their serial numbers.

			== Best? ==

			I (personally) don't think this is the best. Shamals are very fast and have excellent handling, ATs are near Industructable and the StuntPlane has the best Handling. The Hydra hardly moves, it took me 4 minutes to get from the Fort Carson Safehouse to San Fierro Airport whereas in the Shamal it took 1 minute. :/. --[[User:Khan1998stevewhite\|Khan1998stevewhite]] 14:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

gtw>Montybrady: /* Respawn? */

2010-07-26T01:49:12Z

Respawn?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 26 July 2010
Line 29:		Line 29:

	well I knew that. Im just saying, that when in hover mode, its REALLY hard to do vtol. (--[[User:GTAddict\|GTAddict]] 06:45, September 26, 2009 (UTC))		well I knew that. Im just saying, that when in hover mode, its REALLY hard to do vtol. (--[[User:GTAddict\|GTAddict]] 06:45, September 26, 2009 (UTC))

			It depends on how well you can execute the VTOL. Some people find it hard, but I for one find it INCREDIBLY easy. It depends on how long you've been playing the game and flying h (years in my case). [[User:Montybrady\|Montybrady]] 01:49, July 26, 2010 (UTC)

	== Countermeasure ==		== Countermeasure ==

gtw>Funildodeus at 14:07, 15 October 2009

2009-10-15T14:07:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:07, 15 October 2009
Line 48:		Line 48:
	Where did you get that info on the numbering? I have looked up pictures of Harriers and they don't seem to follow that rule		Where did you get that info on the numbering? I have looked up pictures of Harriers and they don't seem to follow that rule
	[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/AV-8B_VMA-214_LHA-5_2005.JPEG here] and [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/BAE-McDonell-Douglas_AV8B_edit5.jpg here].--[[User:Thescarydude\|Thescarydude]] 18:29, October 14, 2009 (UTC)		[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/AV-8B_VMA-214_LHA-5_2005.JPEG here] and [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/BAE-McDonell-Douglas_AV8B_edit5.jpg here].--[[User:Thescarydude\|Thescarydude]] 18:29, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

			I'm in the Air Force, that's how we number them, but after a two second Google search I came across [http://home.att.net/~jbaugher/navyserials.html this] and suddenly feel very stupid. Apparently the Navy just counts their aircraft for their serial numbers.

Thescarydude: /* Neat Easter Egg I noticed */

2009-10-14T18:29:29Z

Neat Easter Egg I noticed

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:29, 14 October 2009
Line 45:		Line 45:

	That's the numbering system the military uses for identification. I'm actually not sure what the civilian sector uses. I imagine it is an oversight by the artists and not anything intentional, just thought I'd point it out.		That's the numbering system the military uses for identification. I'm actually not sure what the civilian sector uses. I imagine it is an oversight by the artists and not anything intentional, just thought I'd point it out.

			Where did you get that info on the numbering? I have looked up pictures of Harriers and they don't seem to follow that rule
			[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/AV-8B_VMA-214_LHA-5_2005.JPEG here] and [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/BAE-McDonell-Douglas_AV8B_edit5.jpg here].--[[User:Thescarydude\|Thescarydude]] 18:29, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

gtw>Funildodeus at 02:42, 14 October 2009

2009-10-14T02:42:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:42, 14 October 2009
Line 43:		Line 43:

	If correct, I think that counts as an oversight on the artists' parts. But don't forget this is a military aircraft, so the serial/numbering systems are different. [[User:Gboyers\|Gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers\|talk]]</sup> 00:57, October 12, 2009 (UTC)		If correct, I think that counts as an oversight on the artists' parts. But don't forget this is a military aircraft, so the serial/numbering systems are different. [[User:Gboyers\|Gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers\|talk]]</sup> 00:57, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

			That's the numbering system the military uses for identification. I'm actually not sure what the civilian sector uses. I imagine it is an oversight by the artists and not anything intentional, just thought I'd point it out.

Gboyers: /* Neat Easter Egg I noticed */

2009-10-12T00:57:35Z

Neat Easter Egg I noticed

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:57, 12 October 2009
Line 40:		Line 40:
	In case anyone was wondering, the numbers on the tail denote the year of build followed by serial number. The number shown on the example picture means that aircraft was built either in 2007 or 1907, one of which is unlikely and the other impossible with the year the game is supposed to be based.		In case anyone was wondering, the numbers on the tail denote the year of build followed by serial number. The number shown on the example picture means that aircraft was built either in 2007 or 1907, one of which is unlikely and the other impossible with the year the game is supposed to be based.

	What? they're just numbers. If we had Harriers in 1907, wow, come WWI, we'd deal a big whoopin'. If a fire truck has 69 on it, it doesn't mean it was made in 1969 (just engine # 69).--[[User:Thescarydude\|Thescarydude]] 23:16, October 11, 2009 (UTC)		:What? they're just numbers. If we had Harriers in 1907, wow, come WWI, we'd deal a big whoopin'. If a fire truck has 69 on it, it doesn't mean it was made in 1969 (just engine # 69).--[[User:Thescarydude\|Thescarydude]] 23:16, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

			If correct, I think that counts as an oversight on the artists' parts. But don't forget this is a military aircraft, so the serial/numbering systems are different. [[User:Gboyers\|Gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers\|talk]]</sup> 00:57, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

Thescarydude: /* Neat Easter Egg I noticed */

2009-10-11T23:16:59Z

Neat Easter Egg I noticed

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 11 October 2009
Line 39:		Line 39:

	In case anyone was wondering, the numbers on the tail denote the year of build followed by serial number. The number shown on the example picture means that aircraft was built either in 2007 or 1907, one of which is unlikely and the other impossible with the year the game is supposed to be based.		In case anyone was wondering, the numbers on the tail denote the year of build followed by serial number. The number shown on the example picture means that aircraft was built either in 2007 or 1907, one of which is unlikely and the other impossible with the year the game is supposed to be based.

			What? they're just numbers. If we had Harriers in 1907, wow, come WWI, we'd deal a big whoopin'. If a fire truck has 69 on it, it doesn't mean it was made in 1969 (just engine # 69).--[[User:Thescarydude\|Thescarydude]] 23:16, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

gtw>Funildodeus: /* Neat Easter Egg I noticed */ new section

2009-10-11T23:09:01Z

Neat Easter Egg I noticed: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:09, 11 October 2009
Line 35:		Line 35:

	:You mean you '''can't''' do it? Sometimes you have to slow down a little, I don't really get why this is though.--[[User:Thescarydude\|Thescarydude]] 01:18, September 13, 2009 (UTC)		:You mean you '''can't''' do it? Sometimes you have to slow down a little, I don't really get why this is though.--[[User:Thescarydude\|Thescarydude]] 01:18, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

			== Neat Easter Egg I noticed ==

			In case anyone was wondering, the numbers on the tail denote the year of build followed by serial number. The number shown on the example picture means that aircraft was built either in 2007 or 1907, one of which is unlikely and the other impossible with the year the game is supposed to be based.