Talk:San Andreas in GTA III Era - Revision history

A-Dust at 20:57, 13 August 2012

2012-08-13T20:57:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 13 August 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Move?==		==Move?==
	What do folks think of renaming this article [[San Andreas in GTA III Era\|State of San Andreas]]? We could then change [[San Andreas in GTA 1]] to [[San Andreas in GTA 1\|City of San Andreas]]. The current names seem a little cumbersome to me. Thoughts? '''[[User:Eganio\|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio\|Talk]]''</sup>''' 03:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)		What do folks think of renaming this article [[San Andreas in GTA III Era\|State of San Andreas]]? We could then change [[San Andreas in GTA 1]] to [[San Andreas in GTA 1\|City of San Andreas]]. The current names seem a little cumbersome to me. Thoughts? '''[[User:Eganio\|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio\|Talk]]''</sup>''' 03:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
	:That ''could'' work! I'm the one that suggested making it like this when this page was just called [[San Andreas]] and there was the other article for [[San Andreas in GTA 1]]. The reason I suggested like this is because that's how the other cities are set out. eg. [[Liberty City in GTA 1]], [[Liberty City in GTA III Era\|Liberty City in GTA III]]/[[Liberty City in GTA III Era\|Liberty City Stories]], [[Liberty City in GTA IV Era\|Liberty City in GTA IV]], [[Vice City in GTA 1]], [[Vice City in GTA III Era\|Vice City in GTA Vice City]]. What does everyone else think about [[user:Eganio\|Eganio's]] proposal? '''[[user:Biggest gta fan ever\|Biggest GTA Fan Ever]]<sup>''[[user talk:Biggest gta fan ever\|Talk]]''</sup>''' 08:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)		:That ''could'' work! I'm the one that suggested making it like this when this page was just called San Andreas and there was the other article for [[San Andreas in GTA 1]]. The reason I suggested like this is because that's how the other cities are set out. eg. [[Liberty City in GTA 1]], [[Liberty City in GTA III Era\|Liberty City in GTA III]]/[[Liberty City in GTA III Era\|Liberty City Stories]], [[Liberty City in GTA IV Era\|Liberty City in GTA IV]], [[Vice City in GTA 1]], [[Vice City in GTA III Era\|Vice City in GTA Vice City]]. What does everyone else think about [[user:Eganio\|Eganio's]] proposal? '''[[user:Biggest gta fan ever\|Biggest GTA Fan Ever]]<sup>''[[user talk:Biggest gta fan ever\|Talk]]''</sup>''' 08:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

	::I didn't like the idea at first, because it doesn't follow the standard rule of naming things with their real name, and the preference for keeping names short. However I think it does a good job of explaining what the page is about - "San Andreas" is still confusing (no matter how often you explain the difference). I also think City and State is a good distinction, but it needs to be made massively clear what the difference is (with a disambig). Go for it. [[User:Gboyers\|Gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers\|talk]]</sup> 14:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)		::I didn't like the idea at first, because it doesn't follow the standard rule of naming things with their real name, and the preference for keeping names short. However I think it does a good job of explaining what the page is about - "San Andreas" is still confusing (no matter how often you explain the difference). I also think City and State is a good distinction, but it needs to be made massively clear what the difference is (with a disambig). Go for it. [[User:Gboyers\|Gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers\|talk]]</sup> 14:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Line 48:		Line 48:
	Since then however, the landscape has changed. The state of San Andreas now has two renditions; one appearing in GTA San Andreas, and the other (partially) appearing in GTA V. This means that it may be time to reconsider the titles (perhaps not immediately, but it's a good idea to start discussing this stuff). The way I see it, we have the following options:		Since then however, the landscape has changed. The state of San Andreas now has two renditions; one appearing in GTA San Andreas, and the other (partially) appearing in GTA V. This means that it may be time to reconsider the titles (perhaps not immediately, but it's a good idea to start discussing this stuff). The way I see it, we have the following options:
	*Move this page to [[San Andreas in GTA III Era]] - This is consistent with [[Liberty City in GTA III Era]] and [[Vice City in GTA III Era]], and allows for the fact that San Andreas is a part of the GTA III Era's universe (not just one game), and covers any references to San Andreas in the other games. This title may not be as obvious, however, as the following:		*Move this page to [[San Andreas in GTA III Era]] - This is consistent with [[Liberty City in GTA III Era]] and [[Vice City in GTA III Era]], and allows for the fact that San Andreas is a part of the GTA III Era's universe (not just one game), and covers any references to San Andreas in the other games. This title may not be as obvious, however, as the following:
	*Move this page back to [[San Andreas in GTA San Andreas]] - Unlike Liberty City and Vice City, San Andreas only appears in one game in this era, so this title can be used without creating the confusion that it did with those cities. ''San Andreas in GTA San Andreas'' however, does seem like a clumsy name.		*Move this page back to [[San Andreas in GTA III Era\|San Andreas in GTA San Andreas]] - Unlike Liberty City and Vice City, San Andreas only appears in one game in this era, so this title can be used without creating the confusion that it did with those cities. ''San Andreas in GTA San Andreas'' however, does seem like a clumsy name.
	*Leave this page as [[San Andreas in GTA III Era\|State of San Andreas]] - This would be a a special case based on the fact that this rendition of the state of San Andreas is the only one to appear in it's entirety in a game. Basically, if this option is chosen, then this article wins due to prominence. Obviously, any necessary links would be added to the top of the page for disambiguation.		*Leave this page as [[San Andreas in GTA III Era\|State of San Andreas]] - This would be a a special case based on the fact that this rendition of the state of San Andreas is the only one to appear in it's entirety in a game. Basically, if this option is chosen, then this article wins due to prominence. Obviously, any necessary links would be added to the top of the page for disambiguation.
	With options one and two, we would also need to decide what to do with [[City of San Andreas]]. Would that be moved back to [[San Andreas in GTA 1]] for consistency with the rest of the San Andreas articles? Both of these options would also see [[San Andreas in GTA III Era\|State of San Andreas]] redirected back to the main disambiguation page for [[San Andreas]].		With options one and two, we would also need to decide what to do with [[City of San Andreas]]. Would that be moved back to [[San Andreas in GTA 1]] for consistency with the rest of the San Andreas articles? Both of these options would also see [[San Andreas in GTA III Era\|State of San Andreas]] redirected back to the main disambiguation page for San Andreas.

	With any of these three options, we could then create [[San Andreas in GTA V]] for any references to the surroundings of Los Santos in GTA V (when needed that is, in the meantime it may be redirected to [[Los Santos in GTA V]]). That article would be created at that title, and would not be moved to [[San Andreas in GTA V Era]] until the announcement of further games in the GTA V Era.		With any of these three options, we could then create [[San Andreas in GTA V]] for any references to the surroundings of Los Santos in GTA V (when needed that is, in the meantime it may be redirected to [[Los Santos in GTA V]]). That article would be created at that title, and would not be moved to [[San Andreas in GTA V\|San Andreas in GTA V Era]] until the announcement of further games in the GTA V Era.

	What does everyone think? Does anyone have any other ideas? Thanks. '''[[User:JFletcher\|JFletcher]]<sup>''[[User talk:JFletcher\|Talk]]''</sup>''' <small>(formerly User:Biggest gta fan ever)</small> 07:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)		What does everyone think? Does anyone have any other ideas? Thanks. '''[[User:JFletcher\|JFletcher]]<sup>''[[User talk:JFletcher\|Talk]]''</sup>''' <small>(formerly User:Biggest gta fan ever)</small> 07:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

A-Dust at 19:59, 3 August 2012

2012-08-03T19:59:35Z

Gboyers: Gboyers moved page Talk:State of San Andreas to Talk:San Andreas in GTA III Era: Consistent naming

2012-03-17T18:46:06Z

Gboyers moved page Talk:State of San Andreas to Talk:San Andreas in GTA III Era: Consistent naming

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:46, 17 March 2012
(No difference)

JFletcher: /* Organisation */

2012-03-16T01:20:44Z

Organisation

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 16 March 2012
Line 57:		Line 57:

	:I would say go with your first option. That would make the most sense and be consistant with the rest of the Wiki if it was "San Andreas in GTA III Era". That would be clean and neat. I'm personally for that. [[User:Grand Theft AJ\|Grand Theft AJ]] ([[User talk:Grand Theft AJ\|talk]]) 22:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)		:I would say go with your first option. That would make the most sense and be consistant with the rest of the Wiki if it was "San Andreas in GTA III Era". That would be clean and neat. I'm personally for that. [[User:Grand Theft AJ\|Grand Theft AJ]] ([[User talk:Grand Theft AJ\|talk]]) 22:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

			::I agree that option one or two is best. Although splitting the different renditions by city and state made sense in 2008, it no longer makes sense with GTA V. I understand the argument that people will make based on prominence - Most people searching for the GTA V location will search for ''Los Santos'', leaving a search for ''San Andreas'' as primarily the GTA San Andreas rendition. However, those people will be searching for ''San Andreas'', not ''State of San Andreas'', and will end up on a [[San Andreas\|disambiguation page]] anyway. So now, I honestly believe that leaving this article here would cause ''more'' confusion than ''San Andreas in GTA III Era''. '''[[User:JFletcher\|JFletcher]]<sup>''[[User talk:JFletcher\|Talk]]''</sup>''' <small>(formerly User:Biggest gta fan ever)</small> 01:20, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Grand Theft AJ: -

2012-03-13T22:56:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 13 March 2012
Line 55:		Line 55:

	What does everyone think? Does anyone have any other ideas? Thanks. '''[[User:JFletcher\|JFletcher]]<sup>''[[User talk:JFletcher\|Talk]]''</sup>''' <small>(formerly User:Biggest gta fan ever)</small> 07:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)		What does everyone think? Does anyone have any other ideas? Thanks. '''[[User:JFletcher\|JFletcher]]<sup>''[[User talk:JFletcher\|Talk]]''</sup>''' <small>(formerly User:Biggest gta fan ever)</small> 07:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

			:I would say go with your first option. That would make the most sense and be consistant with the rest of the Wiki if it was "San Andreas in GTA III Era". That would be clean and neat. I'm personally for that. [[User:Grand Theft AJ\|Grand Theft AJ]] ([[User talk:Grand Theft AJ\|talk]]) 22:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

JFletcher: /* Organisation */ New discussion

2012-03-13T07:57:39Z

Organisation: New discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:57, 13 March 2012
Line 41:		Line 41:

	I was reading the Liberty Tree article about the Eunux controversy and at the end mentioned "a female plumber that was run out of a San Andreas town a year ago". Yes, it said "town", meaning that the State of San Andreas still exists. [[User:Kanzler31\|Kanzler31]] 20:59, 23 October 2010 (BST)		I was reading the Liberty Tree article about the Eunux controversy and at the end mentioned "a female plumber that was run out of a San Andreas town a year ago". Yes, it said "town", meaning that the State of San Andreas still exists. [[User:Kanzler31\|Kanzler31]] 20:59, 23 October 2010 (BST)

			== Organisation ==

			A number of years ago, this article was moved from [[San Andreas in GTA San Andreas]] to [[State of San Andreas]], with [[San Andreas in GTA 1]] being moved to [[City of San Andreas]]. Despite breaking consistency with the page titles of other locations at the time, the move was supported. The reasoning was because the other locations are all cities, so not much can be done to give them simpler titles, but as one rendition of San Andreas in a city, and the other is a state, they were ''able'' to be given simpler titles.

			Since then however, the landscape has changed. The state of San Andreas now has two renditions; one appearing in GTA San Andreas, and the other (partially) appearing in GTA V. This means that it may be time to reconsider the titles (perhaps not immediately, but it's a good idea to start discussing this stuff). The way I see it, we have the following options:
			*Move this page to [[San Andreas in GTA III Era]] - This is consistent with [[Liberty City in GTA III Era]] and [[Vice City in GTA III Era]], and allows for the fact that San Andreas is a part of the GTA III Era's universe (not just one game), and covers any references to San Andreas in the other games. This title may not be as obvious, however, as the following:
			*Move this page back to [[San Andreas in GTA San Andreas]] - Unlike Liberty City and Vice City, San Andreas only appears in one game in this era, so this title can be used without creating the confusion that it did with those cities. ''San Andreas in GTA San Andreas'' however, does seem like a clumsy name.
			*Leave this page as [[State of San Andreas]] - This would be a a special case based on the fact that this rendition of the state of San Andreas is the only one to appear in it's entirety in a game. Basically, if this option is chosen, then this article wins due to prominence. Obviously, any necessary links would be added to the top of the page for disambiguation.
			With options one and two, we would also need to decide what to do with [[City of San Andreas]]. Would that be moved back to [[San Andreas in GTA 1]] for consistency with the rest of the San Andreas articles? Both of these options would also see [[State of San Andreas]] redirected back to the main disambiguation page for [[San Andreas]].

			With any of these three options, we could then create [[San Andreas in GTA V]] for any references to the surroundings of Los Santos in GTA V (when needed that is, in the meantime it may be redirected to [[Los Santos in GTA V]]). That article would be created at that title, and would not be moved to [[San Andreas in GTA V Era]] until the announcement of further games in the GTA V Era.

			What does everyone think? Does anyone have any other ideas? Thanks. '''[[User:JFletcher\|JFletcher]]<sup>''[[User talk:JFletcher\|Talk]]''</sup>''' <small>(formerly User:Biggest gta fan ever)</small> 07:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

HoraceBroon: /* San Andreas State alignment for historical lineage */ spurious involvement

2011-02-03T07:52:51Z

San Andreas State alignment for historical lineage: spurious involvement

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:52, 3 February 2011
Line 13:		Line 13:
	===San Andreas State alignment for historical lineage===		===San Andreas State alignment for historical lineage===
	The City of San Andreas (with all its quarters), should be implemented into San Andreas State in a future GTA edition at a location may be south of San Fierro, further down the San Andreas State coastline. It should be renamed and it's previous bibliography in GTA1 revised from San Andreas City, to 1st City in San Andreas (the State). A suggestion would be to replace "F" with "TH" and rename the first city of SA, Thirst City SA [A conibation and capital of the State of San Andreas]. An alignment purely for historical continuation reasons. This would coherently bridge early editions with the later in GTA. No GTA map past or present should be destroyed or changed only (.a.) ''left alone'', (.b.) ''enhanced'' (may be for fresh difficulty aspect), (.c.) ''expanded/advanced'' (with strict relative reference to map original), (.d.) ''added to'', or all of the previous, eventually plugged into one unifying database. The Unified States of Americana [Ref No 65 on GTA V Wishlist/archive3]...said Prodigy "..let's get it right yeh". [[User:NIM\|NIM]] 06:05, March 14, 2010 (UTC)		The City of San Andreas (with all its quarters), should be implemented into San Andreas State in a future GTA edition at a location may be south of San Fierro, further down the San Andreas State coastline. It should be renamed and it's previous bibliography in GTA1 revised from San Andreas City, to 1st City in San Andreas (the State). A suggestion would be to replace "F" with "TH" and rename the first city of SA, Thirst City SA [A conibation and capital of the State of San Andreas]. An alignment purely for historical continuation reasons. This would coherently bridge early editions with the later in GTA. No GTA map past or present should be destroyed or changed only (.a.) ''left alone'', (.b.) ''enhanced'' (may be for fresh difficulty aspect), (.c.) ''expanded/advanced'' (with strict relative reference to map original), (.d.) ''added to'', or all of the previous, eventually plugged into one unifying database. The Unified States of Americana [Ref No 65 on GTA V Wishlist/archive3]...said Prodigy "..let's get it right yeh". [[User:NIM\|NIM]] 06:05, March 14, 2010 (UTC)


			:'''Discussion of Naming this page'''
			The above points and suggestions, however well-intentioned and even right-minded, aren't really relevant to the issue under discussion. Deciding on the legitimacy of calling this the '''State of San Andreas''' is the only thing in question. Anything else is referring to the speculations of a "wishlist". '''[[user:HoraceBroon\|HoraceBroon]]<sup>''[[user talk:HoraceBroon\|Riddle]]''</sup>''' 07:52, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

	== ARTICLE CONTENT ==		== ARTICLE CONTENT ==

Kanzler31: /* The State of San Andreas DOES exist in the GTA IV era */ new section

2010-10-23T19:59:22Z

The State of San Andreas DOES exist in the GTA IV era: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 23 October 2010
Line 33:		Line 33:

	on the radio there is mention of the governors office, so there must be a capitol city		on the radio there is mention of the governors office, so there must be a capitol city

			== The State of San Andreas DOES exist in the GTA IV era ==

			I was reading the Liberty Tree article about the Eunux controversy and at the end mentioned "a female plumber that was run out of a San Andreas town a year ago". Yes, it said "town", meaning that the State of San Andreas still exists. [[User:Kanzler31\|Kanzler31]] 20:59, 23 October 2010 (BST)

Sharpie14: /* Capitol city? */

2010-08-12T18:45:41Z

Capitol city?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:45, 12 August 2010
Line 32:		Line 32:


	on the radio there is mention of the governors office ~~on the radio~~, so there must be a capitol city		on the radio there is mention of the governors office, so there must be a capitol city

Sharpie14: /* Capitol city? */

2010-08-12T18:45:19Z

Capitol city?

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:45, 12 August 2010
Line 29:		Line 29:

	wait wasn't san andreas a city in gta 1 why is it a state ingta san andreas		wait wasn't san andreas a city in gta 1 why is it a state ingta san andreas



			on the radio there is mention of the governors office on the radio, so there must be a capitol city

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 3 August 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Move?==		==Move?==
	What do folks think of renaming this article [[State of San Andreas]]? We could then change [[San Andreas in GTA 1]] to [[City of San Andreas]]. The current names seem a little cumbersome to me. Thoughts? '''[[User:Eganio\|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio\|Talk]]''</sup>''' 03:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)		What do folks think of renaming this article [[San Andreas in GTA III Era\|State of San Andreas]]? We could then change [[San Andreas in GTA 1]] to [[San Andreas in GTA 1\|City of San Andreas]]. The current names seem a little cumbersome to me. Thoughts? '''[[User:Eganio\|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio\|Talk]]''</sup>''' 03:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
	:That ''could'' work! I'm the one that suggested making it like this when this page was just called [[San Andreas]] and there was the other article for [[San Andreas in GTA 1]]. The reason I suggested like this is because that's how the other cities are set out. eg. [[Liberty City in GTA 1]], [[Liberty City in GTA III]]/[[Liberty City in GTA ~~Liberty City Stories~~\|Liberty City Stories]], [[Liberty City in GTA IV]], [[Vice City in GTA 1]], [[Vice City in GTA Vice City]]. What does everyone else think about [[user:Eganio\|Eganio's]] proposal? '''[[user:Biggest gta fan ever\|Biggest GTA Fan Ever]]<sup>''[[user talk:Biggest gta fan ever\|Talk]]''</sup>''' 08:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)		:That ''could'' work! I'm the one that suggested making it like this when this page was just called [[San Andreas]] and there was the other article for [[San Andreas in GTA 1]]. The reason I suggested like this is because that's how the other cities are set out. eg. [[Liberty City in GTA 1]], [[Liberty City in GTA III Era\|Liberty City in GTA III]]/[[Liberty City in GTA III Era\|Liberty City Stories]], [[Liberty City in GTA IV Era\|Liberty City in GTA IV]], [[Vice City in GTA 1]], [[Vice City in GTA III Era\|Vice City in GTA Vice City]]. What does everyone else think about [[user:Eganio\|Eganio's]] proposal? '''[[user:Biggest gta fan ever\|Biggest GTA Fan Ever]]<sup>''[[user talk:Biggest gta fan ever\|Talk]]''</sup>''' 08:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

	::I didn't like the idea at first, because it doesn't follow the standard rule of naming things with their real name, and the preference for keeping names short. However I think it does a good job of explaining what the page is about - "San Andreas" is still confusing (no matter how often you explain the difference). I also think City and State is a good distinction, but it needs to be made massively clear what the difference is (with a disambig). Go for it. [[~~w:c:gta:~~User:Gboyers\|Gboyers]] <sup>[[~~:w:c:gta:~~User_talk:Gboyers\|talk]]</sup> 14:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)		::I didn't like the idea at first, because it doesn't follow the standard rule of naming things with their real name, and the preference for keeping names short. However I think it does a good job of explaining what the page is about - "San Andreas" is still confusing (no matter how often you explain the difference). I also think City and State is a good distinction, but it needs to be made massively clear what the difference is (with a disambig). Go for it. [[User:Gboyers\|Gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers\|talk]]</sup> 14:37, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

	::		::
Line 44:		Line 44:
	== Organisation ==		== Organisation ==

	A number of years ago, this article was moved from [[San Andreas in GTA San Andreas]] to [[State of San Andreas]], with [[San Andreas in GTA 1]] being moved to [[City of San Andreas]]. Despite breaking consistency with the page titles of other locations at the time, the move was supported. The reasoning was because the other locations are all cities, so not much can be done to give them simpler titles, but as one rendition of San Andreas in a city, and the other is a state, they were ''able'' to be given simpler titles.		A number of years ago, this article was moved from [[San Andreas in GTA III Era\|San Andreas in GTA San Andreas]] to [[San Andreas in GTA III Era\|State of San Andreas]], with [[San Andreas in GTA 1]] being moved to [[City of San Andreas]]. Despite breaking consistency with the page titles of other locations at the time, the move was supported. The reasoning was because the other locations are all cities, so not much can be done to give them simpler titles, but as one rendition of San Andreas in a city, and the other is a state, they were ''able'' to be given simpler titles.

	Since then however, the landscape has changed. The state of San Andreas now has two renditions; one appearing in GTA San Andreas, and the other (partially) appearing in GTA V. This means that it may be time to reconsider the titles (perhaps not immediately, but it's a good idea to start discussing this stuff). The way I see it, we have the following options:		Since then however, the landscape has changed. The state of San Andreas now has two renditions; one appearing in GTA San Andreas, and the other (partially) appearing in GTA V. This means that it may be time to reconsider the titles (perhaps not immediately, but it's a good idea to start discussing this stuff). The way I see it, we have the following options:
	*Move this page to [[San Andreas in GTA III Era]] - This is consistent with [[Liberty City in GTA III Era]] and [[Vice City in GTA III Era]], and allows for the fact that San Andreas is a part of the GTA III Era's universe (not just one game), and covers any references to San Andreas in the other games. This title may not be as obvious, however, as the following:		*Move this page to [[San Andreas in GTA III Era]] - This is consistent with [[Liberty City in GTA III Era]] and [[Vice City in GTA III Era]], and allows for the fact that San Andreas is a part of the GTA III Era's universe (not just one game), and covers any references to San Andreas in the other games. This title may not be as obvious, however, as the following:
	*Move this page back to [[San Andreas in GTA San Andreas]] - Unlike Liberty City and Vice City, San Andreas only appears in one game in this era, so this title can be used without creating the confusion that it did with those cities. ''San Andreas in GTA San Andreas'' however, does seem like a clumsy name.		*Move this page back to [[San Andreas in GTA San Andreas]] - Unlike Liberty City and Vice City, San Andreas only appears in one game in this era, so this title can be used without creating the confusion that it did with those cities. ''San Andreas in GTA San Andreas'' however, does seem like a clumsy name.
	*Leave this page as [[State of San Andreas]] - This would be a a special case based on the fact that this rendition of the state of San Andreas is the only one to appear in it's entirety in a game. Basically, if this option is chosen, then this article wins due to prominence. Obviously, any necessary links would be added to the top of the page for disambiguation.		*Leave this page as [[San Andreas in GTA III Era\|State of San Andreas]] - This would be a a special case based on the fact that this rendition of the state of San Andreas is the only one to appear in it's entirety in a game. Basically, if this option is chosen, then this article wins due to prominence. Obviously, any necessary links would be added to the top of the page for disambiguation.
	With options one and two, we would also need to decide what to do with [[City of San Andreas]]. Would that be moved back to [[San Andreas in GTA 1]] for consistency with the rest of the San Andreas articles? Both of these options would also see [[State of San Andreas]] redirected back to the main disambiguation page for [[San Andreas]].		With options one and two, we would also need to decide what to do with [[City of San Andreas]]. Would that be moved back to [[San Andreas in GTA 1]] for consistency with the rest of the San Andreas articles? Both of these options would also see [[San Andreas in GTA III Era\|State of San Andreas]] redirected back to the main disambiguation page for [[San Andreas]].

	With any of these three options, we could then create [[San Andreas in GTA V]] for any references to the surroundings of Los Santos in GTA V (when needed that is, in the meantime it may be redirected to [[Los Santos in GTA V]]). That article would be created at that title, and would not be moved to [[San Andreas in GTA V Era]] until the announcement of further games in the GTA V Era.		With any of these three options, we could then create [[San Andreas in GTA V]] for any references to the surroundings of Los Santos in GTA V (when needed that is, in the meantime it may be redirected to [[Los Santos in GTA V]]). That article would be created at that title, and would not be moved to [[San Andreas in GTA V Era]] until the announcement of further games in the GTA V Era.