Talk:Vehicles in GTA San Andreas - Revision history

NssJ: /* Spawning Locations & Days Page */

2011-10-07T04:26:27Z

Spawning Locations & Days Page

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 7 October 2011
Line 181:		Line 181:
	\|} All suggestions welcome. I could also just do small charts like that on each vehicles page under location. Make a more defined way to find a vehicle you are looking for.		\|} All suggestions welcome. I could also just do small charts like that on each vehicles page under location. Make a more defined way to find a vehicle you are looking for.
	Also, once its up, Its going to be a lot of blanks to fill in, so help would be appreciated.		Also, once its up, Its going to be a lot of blanks to fill in, so help would be appreciated.
	--[[User:NssJ\|NssJ]] 11:00, 1 October 2011 (BST)		I started a chart for driving [[Perennial]] sat in one location for 1 whole week. I'll be putting that up on its talk page, maybe make some sense of it from there. Some vehicles always show with it, some only certain days, and some only certain time of day.
			--[[User:NssJ\|NssJ]] 05:26, 7 October 2011 (BST)

NssJ: spawning locations and days page

2011-10-01T10:00:19Z

spawning locations and days page

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:00, 1 October 2011
Line 146:		Line 146:
	==Bikes and Pushbikes==		==Bikes and Pushbikes==
	The Bikes and Pushbikes should be in seperate colums		The Bikes and Pushbikes should be in seperate colums

			==Spawning Locations & Days Page==
			I want to compile a chart basically containing the best when and where to find any specific car.
			:I will make it's own page so not to add more clutter here, just wanted to discuss options here before i create a page and leave it empty...
			As I've been adding vehicle locations on some of the rarer ones, I've noticed not only is spawning based on what you are driving, but also what day of the week it is.
			:I emailed Rockstar to see if i could get a list from the programmers, but no luck.
			I'll start it as a MS word doc, but I'll need help on how to put a big chart onto the site. A-Z every vehicle, what can be seen while driving it when and where. Sonmething like this i guess:
			{\| class="wikitable" style="vertical-align: top"
			\|'''While driving this'''
			\|'''spawns this Sunday'''
			\|'''spawns this Monday'''
			\|'''Tuesday...'''
			\|-
			\|
			*[[ZR-350]]


			\|
			*[[Slamvan]] ([[Queens]])

			\|
			*[[Elegy]] ([[Queens]])
			*[[Freeway]]([[Queens]])
			\|

			\|-
			\|
			*[[Rancher]]

			\|
			*[[Tornado]] ([[Los_Santos_Vagos\|Vagos turf]])

			\|
			\|} All suggestions welcome. I could also just do small charts like that on each vehicles page under location. Make a more defined way to find a vehicle you are looking for.
			Also, once its up, Its going to be a lot of blanks to fill in, so help would be appreciated.
			--[[User:NssJ\|NssJ]] 11:00, 1 October 2011 (BST)

gtw>Hangin: /* Suggestions */

2010-08-23T01:05:11Z

Suggestions

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 23 August 2010
Line 144:		Line 144:
	\|}		\|}
	Combine Planes & Helicopters to Aircraft and Include Brown Streak, Freight and Tram into a Trains Column		Combine Planes & Helicopters to Aircraft and Include Brown Streak, Freight and Tram into a Trains Column
			==Bikes and Pushbikes==
			The Bikes and Pushbikes should be in seperate colums

gtw>GTA IV IS SHIT: /* Suggestions */

2010-08-19T23:16:01Z

Suggestions

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 19 August 2010
Line 111:		Line 111:

	:In this game, a vehicle is a valid model in the "cars" section of an IDE file. We should use this as the definition.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|spaceeinstein]]''' 12:49, August 13, 2010 (UTC)		:In this game, a vehicle is a valid model in the "cars" section of an IDE file. We should use this as the definition.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|spaceeinstein]]''' 12:49, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
			:

			{\| class="wikitable" style="vertical-align: top"
			\|'''Aircraft'''
			\|'''Trains'''
			\|-
			\|
			*[[Andromada]]
			*[[AT-400]]
			*[[Beagle]]
			*[[Cropduster]]
			*[[Dodo]]
			*[[Hydra]]
			*[[Nevada]]
			*[[Rustler]]
			*[[Shamal]]
			*[[Skimmer]]
			*[[Stunt Plane]]
			*[[Cargobob]]
			*[[Hunter]]
			*[[Leviathan]]
			*[[Maverick]]
			*[[News Chopper]]
			*[[Police Maverick]]
			*[[Raindance]]
			*[[Sea Sparrow]]
			*[[Sparrow]]
			\|
			*[[Brown Streak]]
			*[[Freight]]
			*[[Tram]]
			\|}
			Combine Planes & Helicopters to Aircraft and Include Brown Streak, Freight and Tram into a Trains Column

Spaceeinstein: /* Suggestions */

2010-08-13T12:49:39Z

Suggestions

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:49, 13 August 2010
Line 109:		Line 109:

	Those aren't vehicles, and quit adding them in. --[[User:Gta-mysteries\|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries\|Talk]]</sup> 10:12, August 13, 2010 (UTC)		Those aren't vehicles, and quit adding them in. --[[User:Gta-mysteries\|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries\|Talk]]</sup> 10:12, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

			:In this game, a vehicle is a valid model in the "cars" section of an IDE file. We should use this as the definition.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|spaceeinstein]]''' 12:49, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Gta-mysteries: /* Suggestions */

2010-08-13T10:12:00Z

Suggestions

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:12, 13 August 2010
Line 107:		Line 107:

	If the [[Tram]] is passing as a vehicle, whty don't add the [[LHD-069]] and [[USS Numnutz]].		If the [[Tram]] is passing as a vehicle, whty don't add the [[LHD-069]] and [[USS Numnutz]].

			Those aren't vehicles, and quit adding them in. --[[User:Gta-mysteries\|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries\|Talk]]</sup> 10:12, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

gtw>Bgtaf: /* Suggestions */

2010-08-13T10:11:07Z

Suggestions

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:11, 13 August 2010
Line 105:		Line 105:
	:Please place replies at the end of a section. No one will be reading recent replies from the top.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|Spaceeinstein]]''' 01:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)		:Please place replies at the end of a section. No one will be reading recent replies from the top.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|Spaceeinstein]]''' 01:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
	Get rid of the tram [[User:Saintsrow2fan2010\|Saintsrow2fan2010]] 02:19, July 6, 2010 (UTC)		Get rid of the tram [[User:Saintsrow2fan2010\|Saintsrow2fan2010]] 02:19, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

			If the [[Tram]] is passing as a vehicle, whty don't add the [[LHD-069]] and [[USS Numnutz]].

gtw>Saintsrow2fan10: /* Suggestions */

2010-08-12T01:52:00Z

Suggestions

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 12 August 2010
Line 104:		Line 104:

	:Please place replies at the end of a section. No one will be reading recent replies from the top.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|Spaceeinstein]]''' 01:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)		:Please place replies at the end of a section. No one will be reading recent replies from the top.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|Spaceeinstein]]''' 01:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
	Get rid of ~~the Andromada and~~ the tram [[User:Saintsrow2fan2010\|Saintsrow2fan2010]] 02:19, July 6, 2010 (UTC)		Get rid of the tram [[User:Saintsrow2fan2010\|Saintsrow2fan2010]] 02:19, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

gtw>Saintsrow2fan2010: /* Suggestions */

2010-07-06T02:19:39Z

Suggestions

gtw>Saintsrow2fan2010: /* Tables */

2010-07-06T02:17:35Z

Tables

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 6 July 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:

	{\|class="wikitable"		{\|class="wikitable"

	\|-
	!Sports Cars		!Sports Cars
	\|\| [[Banshee]] \| [[Bullet]] \| [[Cheetah]] \| [[Comet]] \| [[Hotknife]] \| [[Hotring Racer]] \| [[Infernus]] \| [[Super GT]] \| [[Turismo]] \| [[ZR-350]] \| [[Euros]]		\| [[Banshee]] \| [[Bullet]] \| [[Cheetah]] \| [[Comet]] \| [[Hotknife]] \| [[Hotring Racer]] \| [[Infernus]] \| [[Super GT]] \| [[Turismo]] \| [[ZR-350]] \| [[Euros]]
	\|}		\|}

Line 27:		Line 25:

	{\|class="wikitable"		{\|class="wikitable"

	\|-
	!Sports Cars		!Sports Cars
	\|-		\|-
Line 52:		Line 48:
	--[[User:MattyDienhoff\|MattyDienhoff]] 15:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)		--[[User:MattyDienhoff\|MattyDienhoff]] 15:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
	Okay I've implemented the 2nd one of those tables. None of the vehicles have links yet, and the lists are not yet alphabeticalised. Also need to make sure all SAVehicles are actually listed and spelt correctly.[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]] ([[User talk:Xenon\|?]]) 22:59, 7 May 2007 (BST)		Okay I've implemented the 2nd one of those tables. None of the vehicles have links yet, and the lists are not yet alphabeticalised. Also need to make sure all SAVehicles are actually listed and spelt correctly.[[User:Xenon\|Xenon]] ([[User talk:Xenon\|?]]) 22:59, 7 May 2007 (BST)

			--[[User:Saintsrow2fan2010\|Saintsrow2fan2010]] 02:17, July 6, 2010 (UTC) Do we need the tram on the table because you can never obtain it so it is only a texture. Where is the Jetpack or the Parachute

	==Suggestions==		==Suggestions==

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:19, 6 July 2010
Line 66:		Line 66:
	::Hmm, the Flash ''could'' go into '''2 Door''', but that's already crowded enough as it is unless we can make the columns longer (I'm not sure how and I'd rather not mess it up trying to find out), and I think the Flash is sufficiently fast and sleek to be counted as a sports car, especially considering it's one of the Wheel Arch Angels crowd, same goes with the rest. Following that train of thought, though, perhaps we could create a new category, '''Tuners''', for those cars?		::Hmm, the Flash ''could'' go into '''2 Door''', but that's already crowded enough as it is unless we can make the columns longer (I'm not sure how and I'd rather not mess it up trying to find out), and I think the Flash is sufficiently fast and sleek to be counted as a sports car, especially considering it's one of the Wheel Arch Angels crowd, same goes with the rest. Following that train of thought, though, perhaps we could create a new category, '''Tuners''', for those cars?

	::<~~small~~><~~blockquote~~>"As for the other edits, '''Be Bold''' and hit the edit button."</~~blockquote~~></~~small~~>		::<blockquote><small>"As for the other edits, '''Be Bold''' and hit the edit button."</small></blockquote>

	::I would, but it's kinda protected. ;) --[[User:MattyDienhoff\|MattyDienhoff]] 15:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)		::I would, but it's kinda protected. ;) --[[User:MattyDienhoff\|MattyDienhoff]] 15:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Line 72:		Line 72:

	::I'm going ahead with the other edits, but I'm still thinking about how to handle the first one. It seems the ''Elegy'', ''Flash'', ''Jester'', ''Sultan'' and ''Uranus'' are categorical orphans, as, like you said, they don't quite fit into '''Sports Cars''', but it seems a bit unfair to lump them in with the likes of the Manana and the Bravura in '''2 Doors''' instead. Here's an idea...		::I'm going ahead with the other edits, but I'm still thinking about how to handle the first one. It seems the ''Elegy'', ''Flash'', ''Jester'', ''Sultan'' and ''Uranus'' are categorical orphans, as, like you said, they don't quite fit into '''Sports Cars''', but it seems a bit unfair to lump them in with the likes of the Manana and the Bravura in '''2 Doors''' instead. Here's an idea...

	:#Move ''Buffalo'' and ''Phoenix'' into '''Sports Cars'''.		:#Move ''Buffalo'' and ''Phoenix'' into '''Sports Cars'''.
	:#Move ''Clover'' and ''Sabre'' into '''2 Door'''.		:#Move ''Clover'' and ''Sabre'' into '''2 Door'''.
Line 78:		Line 79:
	::What do you think? --[[User:MattyDienhoff\|MattyDienhoff]] 11:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)		::What do you think? --[[User:MattyDienhoff\|MattyDienhoff]] 11:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

	How about creating a ''Sport Coupe'' subcategorization, since it seems that cars like the [[Elegy]], which do not necessarily fall into either the ''Sports Car'' or ''Muscle Car'' designations, are better defined as 2-door sport coupes, since they are ''not'' 2-seaters like the sports cars, but do not have the engine to be classified as muscle cars. This idea could then be applied to the creation of a ''Sport Sedan'' subcategory for cars such as the [[Sultan]]. What does everyone think? '''[[User:Eganio\|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio\|Talk]]''</sup>''' 20:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)		How about creating a ''Sport Coupe'' subcategorization, since it seems that cars like the [[Elegy]], which do not necessarily fall into either the ''Sports Car'' or ''Muscle Car'' designations, are better defined as 2-door sport coupes, since they are ''not'' 2-seaters like the sports cars, but do not have the engine to be classified as muscle cars. This idea could then be applied to the creation of a ''Sport Sedan'' subcategory for cars such as the [[Sultan]]. What does everyone think? '''[[User:Eganio\|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio\|Talk]]''</sup>''' 20:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

	:Smells of overcategorization to me, I'm afraid. I don't see the sense in creating two new categories ('''Sport Coupe''' and '''Sport Sedan''') for vehicles that could more easily fit into one category '''Tuners''', especially since ''Sport Sedan'' would only contain <u>one car</u>. I think we should just can '''Muscle Cars''' as it's a very subjective term and the line between it and 2 Doors is a very blurred one indeed. The Sabre and the Clover are considered muscle cars, but the Stallion isn't?		:Smells of overcategorization to me, I'm afraid. I don't see the sense in creating two new categories ('''Sport Coupe''' and '''Sport Sedan''') for vehicles that could more easily fit into one category '''Tuners''', especially since ''Sport Sedan'' would only contain <u>one car</u>. I think we should just can '''Muscle Cars''' as it's a very subjective term and the line between it and 2 Doors is a very blurred one indeed. The Sabre and the Clover are considered muscle cars, but the Stallion isn't?
Line 84:		Line 85:
	:Creating a new category, '''Tuners''', for the vehicles that can be modified at Wheel Arch Angels (vehicles which are generally higher performance than regular passenger cars but still not quite sports cars) makes the most sense, I think, and is more consistent with the thinking behind the '''Lowriders''' category, which is exclusively for vehicles that can be modified at Loco Low Co (hence the reason the Tahoma is listed there and not in 4 Door). --[[User:MattyDienhoff\|MattyDienhoff]] 05:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC)		:Creating a new category, '''Tuners''', for the vehicles that can be modified at Wheel Arch Angels (vehicles which are generally higher performance than regular passenger cars but still not quite sports cars) makes the most sense, I think, and is more consistent with the thinking behind the '''Lowriders''' category, which is exclusively for vehicles that can be modified at Loco Low Co (hence the reason the Tahoma is listed there and not in 4 Door). --[[User:MattyDienhoff\|MattyDienhoff]] 05:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

	::Heh, point well taken. What you suggested makes sense. I also agree with you that the category ''Muscle Cars'' is defunct, as '''1)''' no one other than Americans (and maybe Aussies) use the term in any meaningful way, and '''2)''' there are cars in there that hardly fit the standards for qualifying as a mucle car, specifically the [[Elegy]], [[Flash]], [[Sultan]], [[Uranus]], and [[Jester]], leaving only a few entries. These I think should just be partitioned into their body type category, i.e. 2-door, etc. And as far as ''Sports Cars'' are concerned, as far as I understand the term, it refers to high performance 2-seaters, which excludes the [[Buffalo]] (and maybe the [[Phoenix]]?), so I would be cautious as to what I put in there. '''[[User:Eganio\|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio\|Talk]]''</sup>''' 08:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)		::Heh, point well taken. What you suggested makes sense. I also agree with you that the category ''Muscle Cars'' is defunct, as '''1)''' no one other than Americans (and maybe Aussies) use the term in any meaningful way, and '''2)''' there are cars in there that hardly fit the standards for qualifying as a mucle car, specifically the [[Elegy]], [[Flash]], [[Sultan]], [[Uranus]], and [[Jester]], leaving only a few entries. These I think should just be partitioned into their body type category, i.e. 2-door, etc. And as far as ''Sports Cars'' are concerned, as far as I understand the term, it refers to high performance 2-seaters, which excludes the [[Buffalo]] (and maybe the [[Phoenix]]?), so I would be cautious as to what I put in there. '''[[User:Eganio\|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio\|Talk]]''</sup>''' 08:01, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

	Is there a chart or guide on which vehicles bring the highest SexAppeal? --[[User:Funka!\|Funka!]] 04:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC)		Is there a chart or guide on which vehicles bring the highest SexAppeal? --[[User:Funka!\|Funka!]] 04:45, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Line 103:		Line 104:

	:Please place replies at the end of a section. No one will be reading recent replies from the top.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|Spaceeinstein]]''' 01:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)		:Please place replies at the end of a section. No one will be reading recent replies from the top.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein\|Spaceeinstein]]''' 01:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
			Get rid of the Andromada and the tram [[User:Saintsrow2fan2010\|Saintsrow2fan2010]] 02:19, July 6, 2010 (UTC)