Talk:Mulholland Intersection

From Grand Theft Wiki
Revision as of 10:47, 25 June 2008 by Eganio (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

There's a few things I would change in this article. For example the weapons section - a sentence explaining where in the intersection to find the tear gas would perhaps be useful. I doubt an entire section dedicated to one sentence or bullet point is neccessary. Same goes for most of the other sections.

I also don't think the big paragraph explaining the details behind the missions is neccessary - I would just say they occur here, and maybe one sentence saying "X chases Y through the intersection in the ___ mission for person Z". If people want to read up about that mission, they can click through and have all the detail (and walkthrough) they need.

One issue I have is that there are actually spoilers of GTASA missions in this article, including a major plot development. Spoilers should be restricted to the mission page that details that mission, which is where you would expect to find that sort of information.

Also, I'd add Category:Los Santos instead of just the category explaining all intersections ever. Category:Intersections shouldn't be in Category:Transportation in GTA San Andreas, since it covers multiple games (or should eventually). Thoughts? Gboyers talk 23:56, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I absolutely agree with everything you mentioned. I just haven't gotten around to most of it! :-) As far as the Events of GTA San Andreas heading, I am loathe to remove it, although I certainly agree that spoliers should go. Is it alright if I try to find a more Los Santos tourism board-esque way of describing this location, or perhaps try to approach it from a more naive point of view, as a would-be new player would view it? What do you think?
Also, how about lumping pick-ups and vehicles into one heading (e.g. Items or Spawns, etc.) instead of breaking them into multiple one-line headings like I've been doing for district articles (see all districts in San Fierro)? I was thinking we could have one heading, with subheadings underneath, each with relevant location descriptions. What's your opinion? EganioTalk 00:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

A single pickups heading would be good, and just used bold text for the subheadings (rather than ====). Don't forget to explain where exactly to find them. I like the tourist-board idea (eg "MI is a great way to reach north LV if you're on holiday" or whatever), but be careful not to be patronising (like I just was), and try to stick to facts. Implement your ideas, and we'll go from there. Gboyers talk 09:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Got it. Let's see what I can come up with! :-D EganioTalk 09:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Alright, see here. I've still got to add descriptions for the locations of things under Items, but it's a work in progress. Let me know what you think. EganioTalk 10:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)