Category talk:Pedestrians: Difference between revisions
m (Category talk:Strange Pedestrians moved to Category talk:Pedestrians: Category was renamed) |
(Reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I suggest a move of this category to '''Pedestrians''' in general. The definition of "strange" is very vague as any pedestrians in the game can be considered "strange." I also want a request on the naming scheme of pedestrians in the game. I propose using the pedestrian's model name as the title of the article. Thoughts?--[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]] 22:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | I suggest a move of this category to '''Pedestrians''' in general. The definition of "strange" is very vague as any pedestrians in the game can be considered "strange." I also want a request on the naming scheme of pedestrians in the game. I propose using the pedestrian's model name as the title of the article. Thoughts?--[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]] 22:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I agree, also because what about other pedestrians we have articles about? With so few pages in the category, it's stupid to have two separate categories for what are virtually the same topic. Besides, all the pedestrians are meant to be "strange" in some way, it's just what Rockstar does. So anyway, I renamed the category (I don't refer to it as a "move" as it is a very different process ''renaming a category'' and simply pressing a ''move'' button for any other article). I also think that you have a good point with using the model name (as long as anything else possible redirects). Thoughts? '''[[User:Biggest gta fan ever|Biggest GTA Fan Ever]]<sup>''[[User talk:Biggest gta fan ever|Talk]]''</sup>''' 00:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:25, 15 April 2009
I suggest a move of this category to Pedestrians in general. The definition of "strange" is very vague as any pedestrians in the game can be considered "strange." I also want a request on the naming scheme of pedestrians in the game. I propose using the pedestrian's model name as the title of the article. Thoughts?--spaceeinstein 22:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, also because what about other pedestrians we have articles about? With so few pages in the category, it's stupid to have two separate categories for what are virtually the same topic. Besides, all the pedestrians are meant to be "strange" in some way, it's just what Rockstar does. So anyway, I renamed the category (I don't refer to it as a "move" as it is a very different process renaming a category and simply pressing a move button for any other article). I also think that you have a good point with using the model name (as long as anything else possible redirects). Thoughts? Biggest GTA Fan EverTalk 00:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)