Talk:Dimitri Rascalov: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:36, 2 July 2010

is dimitri not the best gta villian? i think so better than previous villians. -Gtafan310

Well, let's grade them-I think, Officer Frank Tenpenny is best. He got many soldiers with corrupt(or medium) officers, gangsters(Ballas. Los Santos Vagos), etc. And he masterminding some gang wars and Los Santos Riot. Dimitri Rascalov was just master of betrayal, but he got business talent, I think. In conclusion, Tenpenny is best antagonist in GTA III era, Dimitri in GTA IV era. Mr.Korean 15:36, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:34, 2 July 2010 (view source) Gtafan310 (talk \| contribs) (Created page with 'is dimitri not the best gta villian? i think so better than previous villians')		Revision as of 15:36, 2 July 2010 (view source) gtw>Mr.Korean No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	is dimitri not the best gta villian? i think so better than previous villians		is dimitri not the best gta villian? i think so better than previous villians. -Gtafan310

			<dl _rte_empty_lines_before="1"><dd _rte_dragged="true" _rte_spaces_before="1">Well, let's grade them-I think, Officer [[Frank Tenpenny]] is best. He got many soldiers with corrupt(or medium) officers, gangsters([[Ballas]]. [[Los Santos Vagos]]), etc. And he masterminding some gang wars and Los Santos Riot. Dimitri Rascalov was just master of [[The Master and the Molotov\|betrayal]], but he got business talent, I think. In conclusion, Tenpenny is best antagonist in GTA III era, Dimitri in GTA IV era. [[User:Mr.Korean\|Mr.Korean]] 15:36, July 2, 2010 (UTC)</dd></dl>