1,604
edits
Talk:GTA V Era: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
:I'm not sure that's true. An era page isn't there to ''justify'' why a game is different enough to earn its own era. It's there simply to describe the games that are in that era. I agree we don't really need a whole page here at the moment, because the era IS just one game (for now). [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 15:52, 6 November 2011 (GMT) | :I'm not sure that's true. An era page isn't there to ''justify'' why a game is different enough to earn its own era. It's there simply to describe the games that are in that era. I agree we don't really need a whole page here at the moment, because the era IS just one game (for now). [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 15:52, 6 November 2011 (GMT) | ||
::"I understand and appreciate the concern of all involved, but I have to make a decision here and say that GTA V is a new era." I agree that at one point a decision will have to be made, but at this point - when we don't know anything related to the storyline - any decision that will be made counts as speculation. The decision does not stand on any proper ground; patterns are not a way to justify the decision, as Rockstar can easily decide to disregard that. I see no problems with referring to it as the GTA V era in community-related places, but I reckon it is not a wise move to mention it on canonical articles. -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] ([[User talk:Master Sima Yi|talk]]) 16:43, 6 November 2011 (GMT) | |||