Talk:John Hunter: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
MAINEiac4434 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::RL time constraints prevented me from doing it that one time. [[User:GeneralGoose|GeneralGoose]] 19:58, September 5, 2010 (UTC) | ::RL time constraints prevented me from doing it that one time. [[User:GeneralGoose|GeneralGoose]] 19:58, September 5, 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Left-Wing?== | |||
On Intelligent Agenda, Hunter clearly describes himself as a Conservative-Liberal (e.g., a moderate, or potentially right-leaning). While he's significantly further left than Graves, he's still very right. He also wants to break the teacher's unions (another Intelligent Agenda thing), which no self-respecting lefty wants to do (I should know, I am one). [[User:MAINEiac4434|MAINEiac4434]] |
Latest revision as of 17:31, 9 February 2011
Can someone fix the blatant bias here? I mean, if I was a Libertonian I'd probably vote Hunter, but come on! The page says, matter-of-factly, he is a better candidate and has a good plan for America. GeneralGoose 03:16, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
- I fixed the bias here, but if it is blatant then you have the power to hit the edit button and remove it yourself. Chimpso (Talk) 10:09, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
- RL time constraints prevented me from doing it that one time. GeneralGoose 19:58, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Left-Wing?
On Intelligent Agenda, Hunter clearly describes himself as a Conservative-Liberal (e.g., a moderate, or potentially right-leaning). While he's significantly further left than Graves, he's still very right. He also wants to break the teacher's unions (another Intelligent Agenda thing), which no self-respecting lefty wants to do (I should know, I am one). MAINEiac4434