Talk:Nude & XXX Shop: Difference between revisions
(comment) |
(cmt) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm afraid that two lines cannot form a proper article. It should be either expanded or deleted, I think. [[User:Qweedsa|Qweedsa]] 05:32, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | I'm afraid that two lines cannot form a proper article. It should be either expanded or deleted, I think. [[User:Qweedsa|Qweedsa]] 05:32, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Wrong, there are some article with only HALF a line that have been here for ages. This should not be deleted. --[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]] 09:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
OK then, I will not insist on it. But I'm convinced such "articles" are not useful enough — having a bigger one seems for me more reasonable. Some [[m:Mergism|mergism]] maybe :-) [[User:Qweedsa|Qweedsa]] 10:05, 31 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
:There are many articles describing backround stores such as [[Will's Snack Shop]] or [[Dom's Rubber Shop]]. These pages are fine the way they are. --[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]] 10:08, 31 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
I see. Thank you for your explanation, anyhow. [[User:Qweedsa|Qweedsa]] 10:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:20, 31 July 2009
I'm afraid that two lines cannot form a proper article. It should be either expanded or deleted, I think. Qweedsa 05:32, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Wrong, there are some article with only HALF a line that have been here for ages. This should not be deleted. --Chimpso 09:14, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
OK then, I will not insist on it. But I'm convinced such "articles" are not useful enough — having a bigger one seems for me more reasonable. Some mergism maybe :-) Qweedsa 10:05, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- There are many articles describing backround stores such as Will's Snack Shop or Dom's Rubber Shop. These pages are fine the way they are. --Chimpso 10:08, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
I see. Thank you for your explanation, anyhow. Qweedsa 10:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)