Talk:Rustler: Difference between revisions

(→‎Protection: new section)
Line 12: Line 12:


This article has been protected to prevent continued edit warring.  Editors ''must'' discuss changes before seeking to make edits, as many aspects of the plane's design seem to be highly debatable, and a major source of contention.  Please post your comments on this talk page regarding why you think particular design influences are more accurate than others, rather than reverting each other's edits.  Discussion is a key aspect of making this wiki run smoothly.  It benefits no one to argue and incessantly revert edits.  The expiry on the protection is 3 days.  If after this time, editors continue to war without discussing things on the talk page, the article will be protected indefinitely, and all edits will require [[administrator]] approval. '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 23:03, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
This article has been protected to prevent continued edit warring.  Editors ''must'' discuss changes before seeking to make edits, as many aspects of the plane's design seem to be highly debatable, and a major source of contention.  Please post your comments on this talk page regarding why you think particular design influences are more accurate than others, rather than reverting each other's edits.  Discussion is a key aspect of making this wiki run smoothly.  It benefits no one to argue and incessantly revert edits.  The expiry on the protection is 3 days.  If after this time, editors continue to war without discussing things on the talk page, the article will be protected indefinitely, and all edits will require [[administrator]] approval. '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 23:03, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
:I even added more important info about the Rustler. Unfourtunately, somebody had to remove it because it is "irrelevant". I don't see nothing irrelevant here. Just someone removing all of my important edits I've made for no apparent reason at all. Geez. Talk about someone that does'nt own GTA games in order to know more like me and everyone else. [[User:MetaCracken|MetaCracken]] 16:31, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:31, 2 August 2008

Mustang or Tempest

Here's a Rustler:http://www.gta-source.com/sa/vehicles/Rustler.jpg Here's a P-51: http://www.vg-photo.com/wallpaper/1280x1024/Mustang2_DSC_3436.jpg Here's a Tempest:http://www.world-war-2-planes.com/hawker_tempest.html Case closed. I'll be accepting your apology now, Jager.

Oh really? Yes, it does look more like the Mustang - particularly the wings, cockpit, horizontal stabilisers, nose/bonnet/hood. However, some things look more like a combination of the two. The vertical stabiliser (tailfin) looks like the Tempest, and the air intake looks halfway between the two. The main body of the aircraft, with the split-height fuselage fore and aft of the cockpit, and the squared-off wings, probably confirm that it is the Mustang.

However, I'd very much like you to change your attitude towards your fellow editors - sure he made a mistake, because it looks slightly more like the Mustang than the Tempest (only to the trained eye), but his purpose here is the same as yours - to improve our encyclopaedic content. I'd hope this isn't a British vs American thing either. Gboyers talk 16:57, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

The vertical stabilizer, I'll give you, but the horizontal stabilizers are mustang. The air intake below the nose resembles the Mustangs, as the Tempest I has a Typhoon-type intake while the Tempest II has no intake...being that it is powered by a radial engine. My exasperation comes from having to repeatedly edit the post to ensure it authenticy. When it comes to aviation...I don't make mistakes. Ever. It is not a case of UK versus US, as both aircraft are British in origin. The Mustang was designed at the request of the British Government. The British replaced the Allison engine with the Rolls Royce Merlon, famous for being the 'Spitfire Engine,' and the Mustang was born. Allison engined airframes were modified for use as dive-bombers and carried the designation A-36 Apache.

Protection

This article has been protected to prevent continued edit warring. Editors must discuss changes before seeking to make edits, as many aspects of the plane's design seem to be highly debatable, and a major source of contention. Please post your comments on this talk page regarding why you think particular design influences are more accurate than others, rather than reverting each other's edits. Discussion is a key aspect of making this wiki run smoothly. It benefits no one to argue and incessantly revert edits. The expiry on the protection is 3 days. If after this time, editors continue to war without discussing things on the talk page, the article will be protected indefinitely, and all edits will require administrator approval. EganioTalk 23:03, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I even added more important info about the Rustler. Unfourtunately, somebody had to remove it because it is "irrelevant". I don't see nothing irrelevant here. Just someone removing all of my important edits I've made for no apparent reason at all. Geez. Talk about someone that does'nt own GTA games in order to know more like me and everyone else. MetaCracken 16:31, 2 August 2008 (UTC)