Talk:San Andreas in GTA 1: Difference between revisions

Line 6: Line 6:


==SAN ANDREAS STATE ALIGNMENT FOR HISTORICAL LINEAGE==
==SAN ANDREAS STATE ALIGNMENT FOR HISTORICAL LINEAGE==
The City of San Andreas (with all it's quarters) should be implemented into San Andreas State in a future GTA edition at a location maybe south of San Fierro, further down the San Andreas State coastline. An alignment purely for historical continuation reasons bridgeing early editions with the latest editions in GTA .[[User:NIM|NIM]] 20:58, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
 
The City of San Andreas (with all it's quarters) should be implemented into San Andreas State in a future GTA edition at a location maybe south of San Fierro, further down the San Andreas State coastline. It should be renamed and it's previous bibliography in earlier GTA revised from San Andreas City to 1st City in San Andreas (the State). A suggestion would be to replace "F" with "Th" and rename the first city of SA, '''Thirst City SA'''. [A conibation and capital of the state of San Andreas]. An alignment purely for historical continuation reasons bridgeing early editions with the latest editions in GTA. No GTA map past or present should be destroyed or changed, only ''left alone'', ''enhanced ''(maybe for fresh difficulty aspect), ''expanded/advanced'' (with strict relative reference to map original), ''added to'' or all of the above eventually plugged in to one unifying database. '''The Unified States of Americana''' [''Ref GTA V Wishlist'' ''65'']. [[User:NIM|NIM]] 20:58, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:58, 28 February 2010

Move?

What do folks think of renaming this article City of San Andreas? We could then change San Andreas in GTA San Andreas to State of San Andreas. The current names seem a little cumbersome to me. Thoughts? EganioTalk 03:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

That could work! I'm the one that suggested making it like this when the San Andreas in GTA San Andreas page was just called San Andreas and there was this article for San Andreas in GTA 1. The reason I suggested like this is because that's how the other cities are set out. eg. Liberty City in GTA 1, Liberty City in GTA III/Liberty City Stories, Liberty City in GTA IV, Vice City in GTA 1, Vice City in GTA Vice City. What does everyone else think about Eganio's proposal? Biggest GTA Fan EverTalk 08:30, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
For the matter of keeping everything together, continue this discussion at Talk:San Andreas in GTA San Andreas.


SAN ANDREAS STATE ALIGNMENT FOR HISTORICAL LINEAGE

The City of San Andreas (with all it's quarters) should be implemented into San Andreas State in a future GTA edition at a location maybe south of San Fierro, further down the San Andreas State coastline. It should be renamed and it's previous bibliography in earlier GTA revised from San Andreas City to 1st City in San Andreas (the State). A suggestion would be to replace "F" with "Th" and rename the first city of SA, Thirst City SA. [A conibation and capital of the state of San Andreas]. An alignment purely for historical continuation reasons bridgeing early editions with the latest editions in GTA. No GTA map past or present should be destroyed or changed, only left alone, enhanced (maybe for fresh difficulty aspect), expanded/advanced (with strict relative reference to map original), added to or all of the above eventually plugged in to one unifying database. The Unified States of Americana [Ref GTA V Wishlist 65]. NIM 20:58, February 27, 2010 (UTC)