Talk:Tags: Difference between revisions

m (Talk:Graffiti moved to Talk:Tags: Referred to as Tags in the Collectibles article)
Line 2: Line 2:


The information in this article already exists in the [[Collectibles]] article.  There really is not enough information available on this subject to justify its own article.  If editors feel the information is useful on its own, then first, the article's name should conform to the in-universe identity of the item in question (e.g. [[Gang Tags]] or [[Tags]], not '''Graffiti'''), and second, the article needs to be expanded to include information not present in the [[Collectibles]] article...otherwise, it is redundant.  Thoughts? '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 04:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
The information in this article already exists in the [[Collectibles]] article.  There really is not enough information available on this subject to justify its own article.  If editors feel the information is useful on its own, then first, the article's name should conform to the in-universe identity of the item in question (e.g. [[Gang Tags]] or [[Tags]], not '''Graffiti'''), and second, the article needs to be expanded to include information not present in the [[Collectibles]] article...otherwise, it is redundant.  Thoughts? '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 04:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
:I disagree. All [[Collectibles]] should have their own page, which can explain the ins and outs of collecting them, and include an image of the collectible, and a map of their location for each game they're featured in. The Collectibles page actually should have LESS information on than it currently does - [[w:c:gta:User:Gboyers|Gboyers]] <sup>[[:w:c:gta:User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 20:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)