User talk:Hardrock182: Difference between revisions
Reply
No edit summary |
(Reply) |
||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
== Vehicles in GTA IV Era == | == Vehicles in GTA IV Era == | ||
Hardrock182, you are really | Hardrock182, you are really pissing me off. I created a page called "Vehicles in GTA IV Era" and you deleted it you piece of shit. I created it so people didn't have to keep going from pages: Vehicles in GTA IV, Vehicles in The Lost and Damned and Vehicles in The Ballad of Gay Tony to know all the cars in the GTA IV Era. But You had to delete it you fuck. | ||
:I agree with Olivercooke, we should create "Vehicles in xy Era" pages. --[[User:DT-boy|DT-boy]] 09:22, October 18, 2009 (UTC) | :I agree with Olivercooke, we should create "Vehicles in xy Era" pages. --[[User:DT-boy|DT-boy]] 09:22, October 18, 2009 (UTC) | ||
::First things first Olivercooke, you're obviously not aware of this, but it ''is'' actually possible to discuss something online without "having" to resort to childish name-calling in a futile attempt to insult the person you have a problem with. Secondly, swearing is against the [[Grand Theft Wiki:Rules|rules of this wiki]], so if you choose to continue acting in such a manner, you will mostly likely end up being blocked. Third, while you ''are'' showing some consideration for other users by making that article, there is ''really'' no need for it (as I already explained in my deletion summaries) - it only takes a few seconds to search for "vehicles in [game name]", and even with the "Vehicles in GTA IV Era" article, the user would still be required to search for it, so as I said, there isn't really any point in having it at all. The fact that you didn't bother linking any articles to "Vehicles in GTA IV Era" either, further reduces their necessity. We also don't need two identical articles with slightly different names, as you did yesterday - you created "Vehicles in GTA IV Era" and then almost immediately after, you created "Vehicles in GTA IV, The Lost and Damned and Ballad of Gay Tony" - the latter of which hasn't even been released yet, and there's no way to know that TBoGT is the last game of the GTA IV Era. Lastly, please remember to sign your talk page comments using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). - [[Hardrock182]] 11:06, October 18, 2009 (UTC) | ::First things first Olivercooke, you're obviously not aware of this, but it ''is'' actually possible to discuss something online without "having" to resort to childish name-calling in a futile attempt to insult the person you have a problem with. Secondly, swearing is against the [[Grand Theft Wiki:Rules|rules of this wiki]], so if you choose to continue acting in such a manner, you will mostly likely end up being blocked. Third, while you ''are'' showing some consideration for other users by making that article, there is ''really'' no need for it (as I already explained in my deletion summaries) - it only takes a few seconds to search for "vehicles in [game name]", and even with the "Vehicles in GTA IV Era" article, the user would still be required to search for it, so as I said, there isn't really any point in having it at all. The fact that you didn't bother linking any articles to "Vehicles in GTA IV Era" either, further reduces their necessity. We also don't need two identical articles with slightly different names, as you did yesterday - you created "Vehicles in GTA IV Era" and then almost immediately after, you created "Vehicles in GTA IV, The Lost and Damned and Ballad of Gay Tony" - the latter of which hasn't even been released yet, and there's no way to know that TBoGT is the last game of the GTA IV Era. Lastly, please remember to sign your talk page comments using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). - [[User:Hardrock182|Hardrock182]] 11:06, October 18, 2009 (UTC) | ||
OK Hardrock182, I'm sorry for the language I displayed. I was a bit angry because it took me about an hour to make the article. I'll stick to editing articles which have incorrect info in.-- [[User:Olivercooke|Olivercooke]] 11.58, October 19, 2009 | :::OK Hardrock182, I'm sorry for the language I displayed. I was a bit angry because it took me about an hour to make the article. I'll stick to editing articles which have incorrect info in.-- [[User:Olivercooke|Olivercooke]] 11.58, October 19, 2009 | ||
Don't worry about it, I can understand that it took you some time to create that article, however, the article (and all of its content) can easily be restored if it turns out that the article ''is'' necessary - so all the time you spent creating it hasn't really gone to waste. If you think an article of that type may be required for something else, or if you just have an idea for a different sort of article at any point in the future, I suggest that you discuss it first - that way we can all come an agreement as to whether or not it is necessary. One last thing, while, you ''were'' being considerate by removing the swearing from your comment, that's not normally seen as a good thing - regardless of your ''actual'' intentions, it may be seen as an attempt to make yourself look like a better person, and also makes the first half of my response to you seem a bit random and unnecessary. Depending on the circumstances, that can also be a blockable offense, although, in this case, it isn't. Nevertheless, I'm sorry to say, but I had to revert the edits you made to your comment - it's nothing personal, it's just for the sake of this discussion. - [[User:Hardrock182|Hardrock182]] 11:59, October 19, 2009 (UTC) | |||