Members
3,795
edits
User talk:Gboyers/archive8: Difference between revisions
responded to a discussion
(responded to a discussion) |
|||
| Line 278: | Line 278: | ||
:I would be happy for you to have the power of deletion, but ONLY to remove spam pages or completely-obvious pages. I would not want it to be used for anything that should be ''proposed'' for deletion or discussed - an administrator needs to make the decision on that. For example, only delete spam, vandalism, and completely irrelevant pages (such as those on which you'd use {{template|spam}} or {{template|vandal}}. If there is any question, opinion, or reason why some reasonable people may disagree with the deletion, you should apply the {{template|delete}} template and let an administrator deal with it. Do you think that is reasonable, and would you like that power on that condition? [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 12:33, 8 October 2011 (BST) | :I would be happy for you to have the power of deletion, but ONLY to remove spam pages or completely-obvious pages. I would not want it to be used for anything that should be ''proposed'' for deletion or discussed - an administrator needs to make the decision on that. For example, only delete spam, vandalism, and completely irrelevant pages (such as those on which you'd use {{template|spam}} or {{template|vandal}}. If there is any question, opinion, or reason why some reasonable people may disagree with the deletion, you should apply the {{template|delete}} template and let an administrator deal with it. Do you think that is reasonable, and would you like that power on that condition? [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 12:33, 8 October 2011 (BST) | ||
Sure, that's fine with me, but can you give inspectors the right to delete articles that has been proposed for deletion, but the general public want it deleted (like four or more people want it gone).--[[User:MrLanceVanceDance|MrLanceVanceDance]] 00:55, 9 October 2011 (BST) | |||