5,680
edits
User talk:Gboyers/archive8: Difference between revisions
→Right to Delete Images: Reply
(responded to a discussion) |
(→Right to Delete Images: Reply) |
||
| Line 284: | Line 284: | ||
Yes, that is understood.--[[User:MrLanceVanceDance|MrLanceVanceDance]] 04:57, 9 October 2011 (BST) | Yes, that is understood.--[[User:MrLanceVanceDance|MrLanceVanceDance]] 04:57, 9 October 2011 (BST) | ||
:When I first read this question yesterday, my initial reaction was no - If inspectors (who are often being trialled for administrator) were given deletion rights, then it would need to be harder to become an inspector, which would slow down the entire promotion process and we would end up with less staff. Moving a page to an undesired title doesn't have a big effect, because usually a redirect is created, so the content can still be found. However, deleting a page causes the content to be inaccessible to most users, which (at least until restored) prevents any improvement to the page and ceases discussion. | |||
:Although after reading Gboyers' reply, that makes sense. Inspectors should always be trusted users - Who can be trusted not to take an action just because they have the technical ability to do so. This in fact fits part of the inspector's role, which involves checking user edits and reverting (or in this case, deleting) vandalism. So, sounds good to me. '''[[User:JFletcher|JFletcher]]<sup>''[[User talk:JFletcher|Talk]]''</sup>''' <small>(formerly User:Biggest gta fan ever)</small> 08:32, 9 October 2011 (BST) | |||