User talk:ZS: Difference between revisions
(→Eras: New discussion) |
|||
| Line 447: | Line 447: | ||
:Thanks for joining in the discussion. I can understand where you're going with this; the structure of each page has to be determined on a case-to-case basis. Single guidelines doesn't apply in every field, simply because the importance of each subject matter varies greatly. - [[User:ZS|ZS]] 17:12, 2 October 2011 (BST) | :Thanks for joining in the discussion. I can understand where you're going with this; the structure of each page has to be determined on a case-to-case basis. Single guidelines doesn't apply in every field, simply because the importance of each subject matter varies greatly. - [[User:ZS|ZS]] 17:12, 2 October 2011 (BST) | ||
== Eras == | |||
Hey. I know you disagree with the Era terminology/groupings, but consistency is important. I don't think half the pages should use one system and half another, and I don't think staff should be reverting each others edits! | |||
I've started a [[Community:Eras|community discussion]] about the era terminology, so that we can explain our points fully and allow users to comment. Please fill in the "why should we not use eras" section. You can then add your opinion on the talk page. Hopefully we can reach a consensus and make a final decision on this. [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 22:08, 30 October 2011 (GMT) | |||