Jump to content

Community:GTA IV Gripes/Characters: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{:GTA IV Gripes/Header}} I want everybody whoever said that this game isn't "New York" to read this. There is a pedestrian that goes by the name of Big Murph. If you provoke him he says "You're fucking with the most feared man in Harlem." This is the only audio reference ever that can be found in the game that suggests that it is New York.
{{:GTA IV Gripes/Header}}




Line 11: Line 11:




{{Gripe}}Returning characters are completely absent, such as [[Claude Speed]], [[El Burro]], [[8-Ball]] or even [[Toni Cipriani]]. There is little explanation why [[Rockstar Games]] did not return older characters from the past GTA eras.
{{Gripe}} I want everybody whoever said that this game isn't "New York" to read this. There is a pedestrian that calls himself Big Murph, and if you provoke him to fight he says "You're fucking with the most feared man in Harlem." This is the only audio reference in the game that suggests that it is indeed New York.
{{Gripe}}Your an idiot,while L.C. is clearly based on New York,it is not New York,just like Los Santos is not LA,Vice City is not Miami,San Fierro is not San Francisco,so on and so forth.
 
 
{{Gripe}}Returning characters are completely absent, such as [[Claude Speed]], [[El Burro (GTA III)|El Burro]], [[8-Ball]] or even [[Toni Cipriani]]. There is little explanation why [[Rockstar Games]] did not return older characters from the past GTA eras.
:{{Rebut}}There is an [[Secrets and Easter Eggs in GTA IV|Easter Egg]] that shows the previous protagonists along with "R.I.P."
:{{Rebut}}There is an [[Secrets and Easter Eggs in GTA IV|Easter Egg]] that shows the previous protagonists along with "R.I.P."
::{{Gripe}}Where is the location to this easter egg?
::{{Gripe}}Where is the location to this easter egg?
Line 24: Line 28:
{{Gripe}}Pedestrian conversations are repetitive and are no where near as funny as they used to be.
{{Gripe}}Pedestrian conversations are repetitive and are no where near as funny as they used to be.
:{{Rebut}}Isn't the game supposed to be more serious? I mean come on, the games based in poor, old, drug and crime filled New York. Nothing funny about that. But i do agree they aren't as funny as prior games but I understand why Rockstar did that.
:{{Rebut}}Isn't the game supposed to be more serious? I mean come on, the games based in poor, old, drug and crime filled New York. Nothing funny about that. But i do agree they aren't as funny as prior games but I understand why Rockstar did that.
:{{rebut}} "As long as ive got a face, youve got a place to sit" "Come sit on my knee cherry blossom" "Typical Male Asshole" Should i go on
::{{rebut}}Pedestrian conversations are extremely funnier than the past ones. In SA, the comedy level will literally dumb you down, whoever posted this gripe. GTA IV comedy from pedestrians is sophisticated. An example would be “I’m not going to fuck him if he has craps” from female groups.   
----
----
{{Gripe}}Some of the characters are downright painful and tedious. i.e. Brucie, Dwayne etc.
{{Gripe}}Some of the characters are downright painful and tedious. i.e. Brucie, Dwayne etc.
Line 32: Line 38:
::{{Gripe}}Or just another failure attempt of realism by R*.
::{{Gripe}}Or just another failure attempt of realism by R*.
:::{{Rebut}} It is not "just another failure attempt of realism", it was obviously a mistake in the programming and not R*'s fault.
:::{{Rebut}} It is not "just another failure attempt of realism", it was obviously a mistake in the programming and not R*'s fault.
:::{{Gripe}} it is r* failt if there is a fault in the programming.
::::{{Rebut}} Every game has faults, smart one!
----
----
{{Gripe}} *** SPOILERS*** The girlfriends are just annoying. Michelle is alright up until you find out she's undercover, so then you loose one of two sane girlfriends. Then at the end of the game you loose Kate who's the other sane one. Either she gets killed or just won't pick up the phone and you basically never hear from her again. This leaves you with the three girls online, and they've all got severe issues. Kiki annoys me as she's a pretentious lawyer type who gets on your case about wearing nice clothes, Carmen is self absorbed and refers to herself in the third person, and Alex is the equivalent of dating Paris Hilton.
{{Gripe}} ***{{Rebut}} SPOILERS*** The girlfriends are just annoying. Michelle is alright up until you find out she's undercover, so then you loose one of two sane girlfriends. Then at the end of the game you loose Kate who's the other sane one. Either she gets killed or just won't pick up the phone and you basically never hear from her again. This leaves you with the three girls online, and they've all got severe issues. Kiki annoys me as she's a pretentious lawyer type who gets on your case about wearing nice clothes, Carmen is self absorbed and refers to herself in the third person, and Alex is the equivalent of dating Paris Hilton.
:{{Rebut}}Niko wasn't meant to like them. As Niko has said to Roman in a phone call, he only dates his online girlfriends to give him something to do.
:{{Rebut}}Niko wasn't meant to like them. As Niko has said to Roman in a phone call, he only dates his online girlfriends to give him something to do.
:{{Rebut}}Despite her vainness (is that even a word?) and sheer lack of anything even remotely resembling intelligence, Alex turned out to be my favorite and the only one I have any interest in what she has to say.
:{{Rebut}}Despite her vainness (is that even a word?) and sheer lack of anything even remotely resembling intelligence, Alex turned out to be my favorite and the only one I have any interest in what she has to say.
Line 39: Line 47:
{{Gripe}} Of all the characters, Carl 'CJ' Johnson is the only one considered dead??Carl is the only one considered canon??why
{{Gripe}} Of all the characters, Carl 'CJ' Johnson is the only one considered dead??Carl is the only one considered canon??why
:{{Rebut}}All of the characters are considered canon, but all are dead.
:{{Rebut}}All of the characters are considered canon, but all are dead.
::{{Rebut}}But not Claude, He got frozen until around 2013 Right?
::But not Claude, He got frozen until around 2013 Right?
::The GTA III era is completely non-canon now, it has been written off, GTA has restarted, Liberty City follows the history stated in GTA IV, Vice City and San Andreas still exist but we haven't seen what they look like yet. But they will have new history and everything that goes down will tie into GTA IV. P.S. That Chinatown Wars game is shit and totally non-canon too.
::{{Rebut}} Claude from GTA 3 is not Claude Speed from GTA 2. If you don’t believe, then you’re a little bit slow. I mean, were on the Grand Theft Wiki, LOOK IT UP! 
::
----
----
{{Gripe}}Niko spends all his time complaining about his life and tells Roman that there's no such thing as a clean start, yet when Dwayne complains about his past, Niko tells him to shut up and have fun!
{{Gripe}}Niko spends all his time complaining about his life and tells Roman that there's no such thing as a clean start, yet when Dwayne complains about his past, Niko tells him to shut up and have fun!
Line 53: Line 64:
:::::::{{Rebut}} Victor feels less out of place, in my opinion.
:::::::{{Rebut}} Victor feels less out of place, in my opinion.
:::::::       {{Gripe}}   I absolutely agree. It's annoying to listen to Niko's constant ersatz-philosophy, then watch him head off to kill someone just because someone who he doesn't even like asked him to. In many cases, there is no compelling reason for why Niko does something, especially in the later stages of the game, when he doesn't have money troubles. All GTA3-era characters were were openly unrealistic, more resembling action movie characters than real people (even CJ somehow worked as a sort of comic-character straight guy in a surreal environment). In GTA IV, R* tries to give us a sense of (pseudo-)realism that simply doesn't fit with the genre. You can't have an ethical character kill 100 innocent bystanders every week and be friends with GTA's crazy, hilariously-clichéd game world.
:::::::       {{Gripe}}   I absolutely agree. It's annoying to listen to Niko's constant ersatz-philosophy, then watch him head off to kill someone just because someone who he doesn't even like asked him to. In many cases, there is no compelling reason for why Niko does something, especially in the later stages of the game, when he doesn't have money troubles. All GTA3-era characters were were openly unrealistic, more resembling action movie characters than real people (even CJ somehow worked as a sort of comic-character straight guy in a surreal environment). In GTA IV, R* tries to give us a sense of (pseudo-)realism that simply doesn't fit with the genre. You can't have an ethical character kill 100 innocent bystanders every week and be friends with GTA's crazy, hilariously-clichéd game world.
::::::: {{Gripe}} what about Darko? A major theme of the game is revenge and Niko wants revenge on the person who betrayed him. He becomes more determined to find "that special someone" in the later stages of the game <u>because he doesnt have money troubles </u>and has friends in high places (like Ray Boccino who helped him find Florian). He would not have found him if he had not killed people for Boccino.
----
----
{{Gripe}} A minor nitpick, but I wanted to mention it. During the shootouts in most missions, Niko screams vicious obscenities at his opponents even though, in most cases, he has no logical reason to be enraged at them. During the shootout in the Majestic hotel to take out the diamond dealers, for example, they're just obstacles in the way of a job that needs to be done, nothing more. It seems more than a bit out of character that Niko screams something like "AAAARRRRRGGGHHH, MOTHERFUCKERS!" at people he's only shooting at because he's being paid to, because it's at odds with his supposedly calm and collected personality. I could understand if he only did so while fighting the goons working for Rascalov, for example, because they represent someone he despises, but the fact is that he gets this worked up while fighting ''anyone''. It's also a bit of a awkward jolt for me compared to what I'm thinking. (I'm usually thinking things like "target down" and "nade out" during a shootout. Yes, I play too many tactical shooters. &gt;_&gt;)
{{Gripe}} A minor nitpick, but I wanted to mention it. During the shootouts in most missions, Niko screams vicious obscenities at his opponents even though, in most cases, he has no logical reason to be enraged at them. During the shootout in the Majestic hotel to take out the diamond dealers, for example, they're just obstacles in the way of a job that needs to be done, nothing more. It seems more than a bit out of character that Niko screams something like "AAAARRRRRGGGHHH, MOTHERFUCKERS!" at people he's only shooting at because he's being paid to, because it's at odds with his supposedly calm and collected personality. I could understand if he only did so while fighting the goons working for Rascalov, for example, because they represent someone he despises, but the fact is that he gets this worked up while fighting ''anyone''. It's also a bit of a awkward jolt for me compared to what I'm thinking. (I'm usually thinking things like "target down" and "nade out" during a shootout. Yes, I play too many tactical shooters. &gt;_&gt;)
Line 71: Line 83:
::::::{{Gripe}}Not really true. If a person becomes homeless, he/she will lose everything, and that means no house, cars towed away, become jobless, even lose a wife. GTA IV has no realism whatsoever when it comes to homeless people driving cars, ESPECIALLY when they lost everything.
::::::{{Gripe}}Not really true. If a person becomes homeless, he/she will lose everything, and that means no house, cars towed away, become jobless, even lose a wife. GTA IV has no realism whatsoever when it comes to homeless people driving cars, ESPECIALLY when they lost everything.
:::::::{{Rebut}} Still not entirely true. A person can own a car that is paid off completely like a used car they bought from a private owner and that can happen before a person becomes homeless. So just because you're homeless doesn't mean you can't live an a car you officially own. Now getting the gas to power said car is another matter but can come down to stealing gas or getting enough money to drive it if possible.
:::::::{{Rebut}} Still not entirely true. A person can own a car that is paid off completely like a used car they bought from a private owner and that can happen before a person becomes homeless. So just because you're homeless doesn't mean you can't live an a car you officially own. Now getting the gas to power said car is another matter but can come down to stealing gas or getting enough money to drive it if possible.
::::::::{{Gripe}}If you have ever seen a homeless bum, then you should know that they're not allowed to drive. That's illegal. Peds in real-life can easily identify the bums by looking at their dirty, old, rotten clothes, and that their appearance that the bum has poor hygiene. Their driver's license DO get revoked after getting fired from the job, no house bills or car bills to pay, and that means no home and no car. Being a homeless person would NOT allow them to drive, since they'll likely get arrested for driving without a license (and thus being homeless). Like I said, GTA IV has no realism when it comes to homeless people driving with no driver's license, and the same goes for real-life.
::::::::{{Gripe}}If you have ever seen a homeless bum, then you should know that they're not allowed to drive. That's illegal. Peds in real-life can easily identify the bums by looking at their dirty, old, rotten clothes, and that their appearance that the bum has poor hygiene. Their driver's license DO get revoked after getting fired from the job, no house bills or car bills to pay, and that means no home and no car. Being a homeless person would NOT allow them to drive, since they'll likely get arrested for driving without a license (and thus being homeless). Like I said, GTA IV has no realism when it comes to homeless people driving with no driver's license, and the same goes for real-life. Dude your gona be homeless someday,because your a moron!
::::::::
{{Rebut}} Where did you hear that? I have seen many homeless people in my life, and many of them lived in the backseat of their car. Taking away one's driver's license just because they lost their home would be depriving them of their rights, and thus unconstitutional. Now I ''have ''seen tramps driving sports cars in-game, which does seem odd. I car-jacked one once, and he said something long the lines of "Aw man, I just stole this car!", so theft is plausible for that situation.
 
{{Rebut}} Don't you get it? It's not a failed attempt of realism, but an actual mistake by the game engine, since they just generate a ped to take the driver slot of the cars, and since at night is when almost only bums and hobos appear at night in more industrialized districts, they take up driver slots in the cars (like when I was playing the other day and I saw a hobo driving a [[Turismo]]). I know it's an engine mistake, and I find it pretty weird for a [[Mafia]] member driving a hobo in a [[Stretch]], but no game can be perfect.
 
:{{Rebut}} When do homeless drive??? Lol in vice city they do but not IV.
----
----
{{Gripe}}Niko is a Serbian. In a few missions he spoke serbian and that's not a serbian accent. Neither is Roman's or Florian's or Darko's.
{{Gripe}}Niko is a Serbian. In a few missions he spoke serbian and that's not a serbian accent. Neither is Roman's or Florian's or Darko's.
Line 89: Line 107:


:{{Rebut}} That's just the way Roman is, at first he was frightened, scared, and depressed, so Niko was being apoligetic, and slightly comforting, though when Roman finally tryed looking on the bright side at the new apartment, Niko realized&nbsp;Roman was fine, and decided to express how he was really feeling. They're two very complex characters haha.
:{{Rebut}} That's just the way Roman is, at first he was frightened, scared, and depressed, so Niko was being apoligetic, and slightly comforting, though when Roman finally tryed looking on the bright side at the new apartment, Niko realized&nbsp;Roman was fine, and decided to express how he was really feeling. They're two very complex characters haha.
[[Category:GTA IV Gripes]]
----
{{Gripe}} Kiki is just an annoying character in the game. Everytime I finished on a date I spend about 2 hours (IN-GAME)doing silly stuf and then I get a text from her saying 'Niko I need you' and other crap. And after that I spend another 2 hours and she does it again and again. JUST LEAVE ME ALONE AND LET ME SPEND A FEW DAYS WITHOUT YOU.
 
:{{Rebut}} If I was you I would either put the phone to sleep or just dump her (she isnt useful a whole lot anyway)
:{{gripe}} i felt little jacob was like jar jar binks up until he becomes a friend
:{{Rebut}} Go to your phone, select kiki then select breakup or something then she will never bother you again until you find her on the internet again
::{{Rebut}} You can also kill her, but that’s complicated.
[[Category:Whetstone]]
[[Category:Whetstone]]
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.