12,236
edits
Future of the GTA series: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
I much rather the 'new' GTA IV way. I find it more fun. Is that weird? --[[User:Stankers|Stankers]] 20:34, December 16, 2009 (UTC) | I much rather the 'new' GTA IV way. I find it more fun. Is that weird? --[[User:Stankers|Stankers]] 20:34, December 16, 2009 (UTC) | ||
I like to see gta go into a florida type area (wouldn't it be cool if there was a few missions where you had to kill a specific target and then have to dump him into a swamp!) or continue on with liberty city (possibly vice city) but it would be nice to see san andreas again but with a little bit more realism because san andreas was (i'll admit) fun but it wasnt as fun as it could have been. Where-as if they re-make it it would oviously have better graphics and with feedback that people have been giving after GTA IV was released I would assume they would let us choose the race, voice, and maybe even gender. could really make a much better game if they did it that way! But that's just my opinion! | |||
:I am definitely against a form of role playing like you described. The basic core of GTA doesn't have extensive role playing. It's mainly about telling the story of one unique person. This is GTA, not SR. GTA should be innovating itself instead of copying core aspects of other games.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|Spaceeinstein]]''' 01:37, December 17, 2009 (UTC) | |||