Talk:Honkers Gentlemen's Club: Difference between revisions
(Reply) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Done, thanks for pointing that out! And no, you didn't need to explain the grammar part (at least to me), besides, even if it wasn't clear to someone, '''in-game name''' is enough for an ''as per discussion'' move. '''[[User:Biggest gta fan ever|Biggest GTA Fan Ever]]<sup>''[[User talk:Biggest gta fan ever|Talk]]''</sup>''' 10:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | :Done, thanks for pointing that out! And no, you didn't need to explain the grammar part (at least to me), besides, even if it wasn't clear to someone, '''in-game name''' is enough for an ''as per discussion'' move. '''[[User:Biggest gta fan ever|Biggest GTA Fan Ever]]<sup>''[[User talk:Biggest gta fan ever|Talk]]''</sup>''' 10:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
::''Gentlemen's'' is actually correct. It was just ''Honker's'' that was wrong.--[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]] 21:51, 8 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:51, 8 April 2009
Move Page?
The name in-game does not have an apostrophe in "Honkers". An apostrophe symbolises ownership, as if Honker is the name of a person. I shouldn't have to explain why this is incorrect. Hbriz 08:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Done, thanks for pointing that out! And no, you didn't need to explain the grammar part (at least to me), besides, even if it wasn't clear to someone, in-game name is enough for an as per discussion move. Biggest GTA Fan EverTalk 10:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Gentlemen's is actually correct. It was just Honker's that was wrong.--spaceeinstein 21:51, 8 April 2009 (UTC)