Talk:Vehicles in GTA Vice City: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:


::I've done the GTA III list, I'll do the Vice City one later today, hopefully. --[[User:MattyDienhoff|MattyDienhoff]] 04:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
::I've done the GTA III list, I'll do the Vice City one later today, hopefully. --[[User:MattyDienhoff|MattyDienhoff]] 04:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
:::All done. Standardizing the column names between games might be a bit too much to hope for at this point, though. For example, '''Gang Cars''' makes perfect sense in the GTA III list but is not as easy to justify in the Vice City list as there are only a few. --[[User:MattyDienhoff|MattyDienhoff]] 06:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:30, 9 June 2008

I'm thinking we should format this and the GTA III list with columns (like the San Andreas list). Both for the sake of consistency and to make it look more professional. The basic list works okay for GTA III but Vice City has a lot more vehicles and this list has become pretty long, I think it'd be easier to read in column form. Anyone mind if I go ahead with it? --MattyDienhoff 16:19, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

It absolutely needs doing, it's just a bit of a big job, and hasn't been a priority in the busy period of the recent GTA IV release. If you're confident enough with the syntax, absolutely go ahead. however, I recommend that you make it at a subpage (eg Vehicles in GTA Vice City/2) so we can make sure it works and perfect it before it goes live. Thanks - Gboyers talk 17:07, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
I've done the GTA III list, I'll do the Vice City one later today, hopefully. --MattyDienhoff 04:24, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
All done. Standardizing the column names between games might be a bit too much to hope for at this point, though. For example, Gang Cars makes perfect sense in the GTA III list but is not as easy to justify in the Vice City list as there are only a few. --MattyDienhoff 06:30, 9 June 2008 (UTC)