Talk:Weapons in GTA IV: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Uhh..?) |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:Yeah, this was pointed out before. I forgot where but I agree. There should be more emphasis on the game than on real life. If you have ideas of improving it, go ahead.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|Spaceeinstein]]''' 07:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC) | :Yeah, this was pointed out before. I forgot where but I agree. There should be more emphasis on the game than on real life. If you have ideas of improving it, go ahead.--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|Spaceeinstein]]''' 07:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::The only suggestion i have is to just plain delete everything that is irrelevant (such as who invented it and all that real life crap) and put links at the end of each paragraph, linking to the gun/guns (in the case of the 416) on the real Wikipedia. | |||
==Knife Take-down== | ==Knife Take-down== | ||
In the most recent edit, it's said that a knife can take down a 'well armored adversary' in '3-6 slashes'. I just wanted to know where the basis for this came from? And what is considered a 'well armored adversary' when they were experimenting this? [[User:Ess-Tee|Ess-Tee]] 05:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | In the most recent edit, it's said that a knife can take down a 'well armored adversary' in '3-6 slashes'. I just wanted to know where the basis for this came from? And what is considered a 'well armored adversary' when they were experimenting this? [[User:Ess-Tee|Ess-Tee]] 05:14, 19 May 2009 (UTC) | ||