68,823
edits
User talk:Gtaunited: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→RE: Saints Row 2: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:I was just saying the full rule (you did not add pictures, so don't worry about that part). As explained above, headings are more attractive to that eye and draw attention to the wish, as everyone wish is treated equally this is not on. Please remove the headings from your suggestion. Thanks. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 09:53, July 6, 2010 (UTC) | :I was just saying the full rule (you did not add pictures, so don't worry about that part). As explained above, headings are more attractive to that eye and draw attention to the wish, as everyone wish is treated equally this is not on. Please remove the headings from your suggestion. Thanks. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 09:53, July 6, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Could you please stop making [http:// | ::Could you please stop making [http://www.grandtheftwiki.com/index.php?title=Grand_Theft_Auto:_Chinatown_Wars&diff=241039&oldid=241021 this edit] to the [[Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars]] page. Most DS games are G/PG rated and aimed at children. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 10:11, July 6, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::When the PS2 was created it was targeted at all ages. When the DS was created, Nintendo aimed it soley at Children, hence the comment in the article about so. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 10:16, July 6, 2010 (UTC) | :::When the PS2 was created it was targeted at all ages. When the DS was created, Nintendo aimed it soley at Children, hence the comment in the article about so. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 10:16, July 6, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::Not so, if you go to shops now-days and look in the DS section, all the games will be G/PG except [[GTA Chinatown Wars]] which will be MA. I think the only reason Nintendo wanted GTA to make a game for them so much is because that their rivals (Sony and Microsoft) are doing far better with their GTA games. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 10:21, July 6, 2010 (UTC) | ::::Not so, if you go to shops now-days and look in the DS section, all the games will be G/PG except [[Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars|GTA Chinatown Wars]] which will be MA. I think the only reason Nintendo wanted GTA to make a game for them so much is because that their rivals (Sony and Microsoft) are doing far better with their GTA games. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 10:21, July 6, 2010 (UTC) | ||
As I said, not all but '''most''' games are directed towards children. This is bcause Nintendo primarily creates childrens games. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 10:27, July 6, 2010 (UTC) | As I said, not all but '''most''' games are directed towards children. This is bcause Nintendo primarily creates childrens games. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 10:27, July 6, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
The subway is static in CW, it is just fast moving texture. The [[Police Maverick]] in CW and the helicopter both link to the [[Helicopter (GTA CW)|same article]], and bulletproof vehicles are just [[Special Vehicles|special]] types of their normal vehicles, not seperate ones. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 03:48, July 7, 2010 (UTC) | The subway is static in CW, it is just fast moving texture. The [[Police Maverick]] in CW and the helicopter both link to the [[Helicopter (GTA CW)|same article]], and bulletproof vehicles are just [[Special Vehicles|special]] types of their normal vehicles, not seperate ones. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 03:48, July 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:The [[Airtrain]] is classified as a vehicle by the game and is solid in several games ([[GTA IV]], [[GTA VCS]] ect.). The [[Tram]] is also classified as a vehicle, it can be targeted by the [[Heat-Seeking Rocket Launcher]] and with the use of mods - it can be entered. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 03:54, July 7, 2010 (UTC) | :The [[Airtrain]] is classified as a vehicle by the game and is solid in several games ([[Grand Theft Auto IV|GTA IV]], [[Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories|GTA VCS]] ect.). The [[Tram]] is also classified as a vehicle, it can be targeted by the [[Heat-Seeking Rocket Launcher]] and with the use of mods - it can be entered. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 03:54, July 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I did not create that article (my edit was to add the proposed deletion tag, as that article is just duplicate information of the [[Special Vehicles]] article). And I have already explained why you cannot create "Vehicles in GTA IV Era". '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 04:00, July 7, 2010 (UTC) | ::I did not create that article (my edit was to add the proposed deletion tag, as that article is just duplicate information of the [[Special Vehicles]] article). And I have already explained why you cannot create "Vehicles in GTA IV Era". '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 04:00, July 7, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 560: | Line 560: | ||
Take a look at this picture. The vehicle.IDE in San Andreas' data files. It clearly states that the tram is a vehicle. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 06:00, August 14, 2010 (UTC) | Take a look at this picture. The vehicle.IDE in San Andreas' data files. It clearly states that the tram is a vehicle. --[[User:Gta-mysteries|Gta-mysteries]] <sup>[[User talk:Gta-mysteries|Talk]]</sup> 06:00, August 14, 2010 (UTC) | ||
[[File:Tram-GTASA-file.png|300px]] | <nowiki>[[File:Tram-GTASA-file.png|300px]]</nowiki> | ||
:Saints Row 2 is not GTA. In GTA, the Tram is considered a vehicle. Please do not ask about this again, the Tram '''is''' a vehicle in GTA. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 01:06, August 15, 2010 (UTC) | :Saints Row 2 is not GTA. In GTA, the Tram is considered a vehicle. Please do not ask about this again, the Tram '''is''' a vehicle in GTA. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 01:06, August 15, 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 621: | Line 621: | ||
I know that sounded like a review, but, yeah, it kinda was, comparing GTA IV to Saints Row | I know that sounded like a review, but, yeah, it kinda was, comparing GTA IV to Saints Row [[User:IanMontes|IanMontes]] 20:06, August 16, 2010 (UTC) | ||
== RE: RE: Saints Row 2 == | |||
I didn't just review physics and graphics. I reviewed The guns, which, are awesome, I do admit, but Yeah, I didn't review the vehicles. | |||
But I didn't review anything or I would just sound like a broken record saying "But then again, the driving system sucks" Which really, really does, which ruined the fun of the game, on the other hand, GTA IV has a unique style of driving, the guns are ok I love them, infact, Stunting in GTA IV is awesome, The story is awesome, should I go on? [[User:IanMontes|IanMontes]] 23:04, August 16, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Too bad they don't show how shitty the driving is, and well, playing bowling is pretty cool, Watching TV is awesome, the shows are funny, which they are showing rockstar's humour, it's also surprising how they didn't mention that if you don't wanna do that, don't do it. | |||
Aswell they might have said "We have a bad story! We also put sucky driving in our games! While they have Hard missions, which are challenging, who likes that!? And they also have awesome graphics and physics, and also, awesome story and guns!" Now excuse me while I take a crap in my Saints Row 2 Disc. ( Yeah, I have steam and disc version. ) | |||
== Yeah, real mature. == | |||
You know, I've been trying to be nice, you just come back here and write these s**t comments, and even post "GTA IV IS SHI!!!!!" in my Talk room? | |||
You know, I won't even argue, in fact, i'm ignoring you, untill you can explain yourself instead of saying "OMFG CHAINSAW TAZE GUN LOL "AUESEM"" | |||
Also, When you say: Swat, Cops, Army, I say another thing: | |||
Are you dumb? It's S.W.A.T. Also, there is "Swat, Cops" | |||
S.W.A.T = N.O.O.S.E. which is praticly the same. | |||
Cops = Cops! | |||
Army = Well, there isn't any, but there's F.I.B. | |||
You said they took out the awesome cars!? AHAHAHAHAH. | |||
Sports car: Infernus, Cheetah, Comet, Super GT. Find these names familiar? YEAH, they were in other GTA games, right?! | |||
Luxury: Cavalcade ( Who doesn't like that? ), Cognoscenti, Sentinel, etc. | |||
Moving on: No planes, Ok. I agree, but still, it doesn't suck for that, come on. | |||
Helicopters: Wow, your critizing the whole helicopter cathegory, by saying that anihilator miniguns suck? You need aim, second, There's other helicopters, you can't just think of the anihilators. | |||
Boats: Wow? They took out speeder, that it? They added more, faster, thanks for thinking. | |||
Bike: They took out the police bike, there you go again, thinking just of one minor thing, criticizing the whole cathegory, you fail | |||
'''When You Finish the Game: I laughed more. New shirt, You can still go out with friends, hear the funny conversations with Brucie, Stunting ( You get more spare time ) Should I name more?''' | |||
'''And now, looking at what you said about Saints Row 2 being the "Dominant"''' | |||
Everything exept for a drill, nailgun and land mines, and a nuke, ausome: | |||
If GTA IV went for realism, they wouldn't put that for sure, the current guns are awesome. | |||
Ausome, 3- wheeler lol: Yeah, that's a VERY cool car! And you criticize the whole GTA IV game that they took out the best ones, and you defend Saints Row 2 with a 3-WHEELER? Give me a goddamn break. | |||
WW2, private jet, WW1, Stuntplane, Dodo and mor: Cool. | |||
Ausmome, Army Helicopter lol: There's only a army Heli in SR2!? OMFG. I know there isn't, but then again, defending it with just one vehicle. | |||
Racing Boat ,Jetski lol: What? Racing boat? There's Boats that can go fast too, explain. About jetskis: Meh, just probably one seater jetski, what's so special? | |||
Peewee lol ( Bikes ): Explain yourself. | |||
Plent of activities to last you a year or 2: Such as? | |||
[[User:IanMontes|IanMontes]] 01:46, August 17, 2010 (UTC) | |||
For a person named "Gtaunited", you really like to divide GTA. Please keep the SR fanboyism outside the GTA wiki. If you really want to discuss about this, why not just discuss it in the [[Forum:Saints Row 2 vs GTA IV|Forum]]?--'''[[User:Spaceeinstein|spaceeinstein]]''' 07:11, August 17, 2010 (UTC) | |||
== If you put it like that.. == | |||
If you put it like that, Ok, | |||
"Cop" you can be a vigilante in GTA IV, so, Yeah. | |||
And now, what I say, "Ambulance driver" and all that other stuff, If you count with handling they are jack s**t. | |||
So, all the "drivers": Out. | |||
And now, "Replaying missions" | |||
What? what do you mean? You can replay missions in GTA IV too, re-do it all over, fail. | |||
Sure there's alot more stuff, I didn't say that there isn't, so you don't need to say. In the side of gameplay/story/graphics/physics, GTA IV is good. In the side of Mayhem/physics, Saints Row 2 is good. | |||
I agree ( and would respect. ) If you would stop with the stupid titles, I mean: "GTA IV IS SHI!!!", "Yeah Real Mature"? ( You just copied that last one, you didn't explain why I was immature. ) | |||
Also, like I said, and will keep on my mind that you don't have GTA IV, you don't have money for GTA IV, that's why you don't like it. Now, like I said, I won't reply to your posts only if you sound.. more mature with your titles. | |||
== One more plane in GTA 5 == | |||
I have suggested to the Rockstar Games to add one more plane in GTA 5 called Marauder, based on Lockheed AC130H. Don't forget it. --[[User:Videogamer13|Videogamer13]] 19:40, September 11, 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Stupid Forum == | |||
What is with that What do you hate about GTA IV Forum, it is rediculous, you call 7 choppers and a paracute totaling in 8 different aircraft not enough ? | |||
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width: 200px" | |||
|[[File:Maverick-GTAIV-front.jpg|thumb]] | |||
|[[File:HelitoursMaverick-GTAIV-front.jpg|thumb]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Maverick]] | |||
|[[Helitours Maverick]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[File:Swift-TBOGT-withdoors-front.jpg|thumb]] | |||
|[[File:Skylift-TBOGT-front.jpg|thumb]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Swift]] | |||
|[[Skylift]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[File:PoliceMaverick-GTAIV-front.jpg|thumb]] | |||
|[[File:Annihilator-GTAIV-gunfire.jpg|thumb]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Police Maverick]] | |||
|[[Annihilator]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[File:Buzzard-TBOGT-front.jpg|thumb]] | |||
|[[File:Parachute-TBOGT-deployed.jpg|thumb]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[Buzzard]] | |||
|[[Parachute]] | |||
|} | |||
And no Tanks? | |||
{| border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width: 200px" | |||
|[[File:APC-TBOGT-front.jpg|thumb]] | |||
|- | |||
|[[APC]] | |||
|} | |||
[[User:Homerjs|Homerjs]] 09:37, September 17, 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Uhh... Gtaunited was banned several months ago. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 13:09, September 18, 2010 (UTC) | |||