Talk:Liberty City in GTA III Era: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


::I think the two Liberty Cities should be merged into "LC in GTA3 era", but not with Vice City because there has not been any other VC other than the GTA3 era one, the GTA1 one has way too little info IMO. And alternatively make the whole Vice City articles into one with a section dedicated to each rendition. --''[[User talk:GTA4PC|GTA 4 PC]]'' 18:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
::I think the two Liberty Cities should be merged into "LC in GTA3 era", but not with Vice City because there has not been any other VC other than the GTA3 era one, the GTA1 one has way too little info IMO. And alternatively make the whole Vice City articles into one with a section dedicated to each rendition. --''[[User talk:GTA4PC|GTA 4 PC]]'' 18:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
:Whilst this is all well and good, consistency is important. If we combine the GTA III era Liberty City articles, then we should combine the Vice City ones too - LCS and VCS don't need to be listed as completely separate cities. I think [[Liberty City in GTA III era]] and [[Vice City in GTA III era]] would be good articles (although simpler names would be better). [[Liberty City]] should give an overview of both GTA1, III-era (both) and IV, and same for [[Vice City]]. Unless anyone has any better suggestions (eg for names) I'll go ahead and do this. [[w:c:gta:User:Gboyers|Gboyers]] <sup>[[:w:c:gta:User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 18:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)