User talk:Chimpso/archive 1: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
its not leatherface its dr.salvador. i do respect your beleifs but you have to respect mine as a myth hunter i am a skeptic untill i get prof by investigating. you should investigate your self. user--[[User:Stephendwan|Stephendwan]] 13:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC) | its not leatherface its dr.salvador. i do respect your beleifs but you have to respect mine as a myth hunter i am a skeptic untill i get prof by investigating. you should investigate your self. user--[[User:Stephendwan|Stephendwan]] 13:45, 11 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Edit Warring & Abusive Comments== | |||
Hey there, I'm glad to see that you actually care about the quality/relevance of edits here on GTW (such users are few and far between these days), and I can ''definately'' agree that a some user's writing and grammar could use a lot of work. However, I don't think being abusive and insensitive towards them is really the best way to approach this situation. In regards to the "unnecessary/useless" edits you've been reverting, the best thing to do would be to discuss them on the appropriate article's talk pages; you may feel that what you are doing is right, but it's better to see if everyone else agrees/disagrees first. I know that may seem tedius and unnecessary, but as I said, it's better to know if you have support or not - of course, in most cases, discussion is unnecessary, such as when reverting vandalism, or reverting edits which are blatantly unnecessary. When tackling the "Myths in [game name]" articles though, you have to remember that most myths ''are'' made up and have little-to-no proof backing them, hence why they are called "myths". - [[User:Hardrock182|Hardrock182]] 17:28, 11 July 2009 (UTC) | |||