Wouldn't Capitol City make a good GTA 5: Difference between revisions
Wouldn't Capitol City make a good GTA 5 (view source)
Revision as of 00:19, 18 April 2009
, 18 April 2009no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Well, I'm firmly against GTAs using past protagonists again (just cheap, lazy and wrong), and considering IV and the III era take place in presumably different canons, the III canon which had just been abandoned, revisiting the III era for V seems unlikely. And travelling between two large regions (D.C is too small for a whole city, but Virginia and Maryland additions would be great additions that wouldn't function as standalone games) would be extremely hard for the developers. [[User:GeneralGoose|GeneralGoose]] 14:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | Well, I'm firmly against GTAs using past protagonists again (just cheap, lazy and wrong), and considering IV and the III era take place in presumably different canons, the III canon which had just been abandoned, revisiting the III era for V seems unlikely. And travelling between two large regions (D.C is too small for a whole city, but Virginia and Maryland additions would be great additions that wouldn't function as standalone games) would be extremely hard for the developers. [[User:GeneralGoose|GeneralGoose]] 14:59, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
I think the next Gta should be like Gta iv in how realistic it is and when you get hit by a car and fall over ect and other things like lifting up cups and able to throw them. But it could be like Gta SanAndreas in many ways like you can kiss your girlfriend and it shows you the date like sitting in the Clukin' Bell. It shouldnt have things like going to the gym. But you can get tatooes* and get your hair styled ect. Also it could include the thing that you can add flames ect to the cars and stuff. ANy other suggestions? | |||
--[[User:Gta's-Bitch|Gta's-Bitch]] 00:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC) | |||