User talk:Gboyers/archive5: Difference between revisions
(→A thought for talk pages.: new section) |
|||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
:Haha - there are much worse people than you around, trust me. It's all good fun though. But good luck - let me know how it goes. [[User:Gboyers|Gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 22:11, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | :Haha - there are much worse people than you around, trust me. It's all good fun though. But good luck - let me know how it goes. [[User:Gboyers|Gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 22:11, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
== A thought for talk pages. == | |||
I've just thought of a way to save people some time reading through talk pages. Once a decision is reached, create a summary of the discussion and when it took place. Any necessary evidence should be stated as well. For example: an argument as to which neighbourhood a street was in. It was answered by a member of R* that it was in North Holland not Northwood. After this argument was concluded, the main text was deleted and a summary was written such as: | |||
''On the date MM/DD/YY the argument as to which neighbourhood such and such street was in. R* concluded this argument by stating that it was in fact within the neighbourhood of North Holland.'' | |||
So, what do you think, is this a good idea or did I just waste my time typing all this out in aid to save time? --[[User:LuisFernandoLopez|LuisFernandoLopez]] 20:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |