Category talk:Public Works: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→porpose: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Ah, yes, point well taken. I've been intending to change or at least explain this category's name for a while; just been trying to figure out how! :-) I'll get on it. '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 06:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC) | :Ah, yes, point well taken. I've been intending to change or at least explain this category's name for a while; just been trying to figure out how! :-) I'll get on it. '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 06:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
== porpose == | |||
this category descripes industral works such as the [[Sherman Dam]] I thaught it easier rather then creating more articles [[User:chip2007|Chip2007]] 1:58 24 JUne 2008 | |||
Revision as of 13:01, 24 June 2008
Can you explain this category? It has two dams, a quarry, a reservoir and a satellite dish... there doesn't seem to be any logical grouping. If you're simply talking about "big structures" then make a category for that, same as you could for skyscrapers or utilities. It is best practise to put a sentence at the top of a category page explaining what goes in it, even if it is stupidly obvious sometimes. For example, Category:Vehicles explains that individual vehicles go in the category, as opposed to just subcategories and lists. Gboyers talk 00:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, point well taken. I've been intending to change or at least explain this category's name for a while; just been trying to figure out how! :-) I'll get on it. EganioTalk 06:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
porpose
this category descripes industral works such as the Sherman Dam I thaught it easier rather then creating more articles Chip2007 1:58 24 JUne 2008