Talk:Windsor: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:27, 12 September 2009

I would suggest that it's not closest to an e-type, but is closer to this [1] without the alfa logo.

In my opinion, it has nothing from an Alfa. And remember, "Windsor" is a very British name (like the Jaguar).--Loadingue 18:27, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:58, 12 September 2009 (view source) gtw>Vanderath (Created page with 'I would suggest that it's not closest to an e-type, but is closer to this [http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1804-Alfa-Romeo-Spider-1600-10503-1966.html] without the alfa logo.')		Revision as of 18:27, 12 September 2009 (view source) Loadingue (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I would suggest that it's not closest to an e-type, but is closer to this [http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1804-Alfa-Romeo-Spider-1600-10503-1966.html] without the alfa logo.		I would suggest that it's not closest to an e-type, but is closer to this [http://www.imcdb.org/vehicle_1804-Alfa-Romeo-Spider-1600-10503-1966.html] without the alfa logo.

			In my opinion, it has nothing from an Alfa. And remember, "Windsor" is a very British name (like the Jaguar).--[[User:Loadingue\|Loadingue]] 18:27, September 12, 2009 (UTC)