3,040
edits
User talk:Sukhoi-35BM: Difference between revisions
→Debate: Reply.
mNo edit summary |
(→Debate: Reply.) |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
I realize that you are endeavoring to keep the wiki "clean" of useless information, and I applaud you for that, but ''please'' remember that speculation is very welcomed here, as is detail. We strive to offer as much information as possible to our readers. Sometimes that information may seem ancillary and even irrelevant to some, but the fact that it may not seem that way to others is why we '''must''' discuss things before making the "final edit", so to speak. '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 21:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | I realize that you are endeavoring to keep the wiki "clean" of useless information, and I applaud you for that, but ''please'' remember that speculation is very welcomed here, as is detail. We strive to offer as much information as possible to our readers. Sometimes that information may seem ancillary and even irrelevant to some, but the fact that it may not seem that way to others is why we '''must''' discuss things before making the "final edit", so to speak. '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 21:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
[[User:Sukhoi-35BM|WS]] 05:47, 3 August 2008 (UTC)What about bad grammar? Should I call a conference for punctuation? | :[[User:Sukhoi-35BM|WS]] 05:47, 3 August 2008 (UTC)What about bad grammar? Should I call a conference for punctuation? | ||
::Grammar is certainly something that should be corrected where necessary. However, the very reason I left you the above message was ''not'' due to issues over grammatical corrections. Rather, the issue at hand is, and continues to be, a lack of composure when dealing with conflict over edits. You will disagree with other editors...it is inevitable. It is the manner in which you handle your disagreements that is in need of adjustment. Again, I applaud you for your contributions. Just please keep in mind that we are a community, and being a member of a such a community begs a more delicate approach to dealing with other editors. Remember, as knowledgeable as you obviously are, aircraft is '''not''' specifically yours. Give other people the chance to defend what you find to be irrelevant or incorrect before you remove it in its entirety. Don't you expect other editors to afford you the same courtesy? '''[[User:Eganio|Eganio]]<sup>''[[User talk:Eganio|Talk]]''</sup>''' 09:18, 3 August 2008 (UTC) | |||