Talk:Do You Have Protection?: Difference between revisions

reply
(wat)
 
(reply)
Line 1: Line 1:
Since I was rv'd, would someone like to explain how the article needs cleanup? It's clear, it's concise, it provides a good amount of information and it's easy to read. Save for piping, this is one of the better articles, from a literary standpoint. [[User:That Thing There|That Thing There]] 19:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Since I was rv'd, would someone like to explain how the article needs cleanup? It's clear, it's concise, it provides a good amount of information and it's easy to read. Save for piping, this is one of the better articles, from a literary standpoint. [[User:That Thing There|That Thing There]] 19:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
:It's in need of cleanup, beacuse it's written like a walkthrough - mission articles are supposed to just describe; who gives the mission,  what happens during the mission, and what the reward is. There's also the extensive use of 'you', which should, instead, be 'the player' or 'Niko'. I ''do'' agree that it's clear and easy to read, but I'm merely following GTA Wiki's [[Grand Theft Wiki:Cleanup|Policy]]
Anonymous user