Talk:Myths in GTA San Andreas: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 75: Line 75:


Spaceeinstein suggested a deletion of this page. I have to say, it'd certainly solve some of the problems which seem to come from asking which myths are "Worthy" of inclusion, or indeed if myths are canon at all. I was originally opposed to this, but I have to say, I've come around. If someone wants to keep it (and some will. I may well do myself, as I think it's a good article, and wouldn't like to see all the work gone to waste), they can always duplicate it in their userspace (eg, I'd put it in [[User:C-d-rom/Myths in GTA San Andreas]]. There you can be free to edit it as you will, add whatever you think is necessary. It's non-canon, it's not misinforming people. I haven't actually inserted a delete tag yet, it's up to a mod if they want to actually do that or not... [[User:C-d-rom|C-d-rom]] 17:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Spaceeinstein suggested a deletion of this page. I have to say, it'd certainly solve some of the problems which seem to come from asking which myths are "Worthy" of inclusion, or indeed if myths are canon at all. I was originally opposed to this, but I have to say, I've come around. If someone wants to keep it (and some will. I may well do myself, as I think it's a good article, and wouldn't like to see all the work gone to waste), they can always duplicate it in their userspace (eg, I'd put it in [[User:C-d-rom/Myths in GTA San Andreas]]. There you can be free to edit it as you will, add whatever you think is necessary. It's non-canon, it's not misinforming people. I haven't actually inserted a delete tag yet, it's up to a mod if they want to actually do that or not... [[User:C-d-rom|C-d-rom]] 17:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm opposing to this. This page is still interesting. For many people, myths play a big part in the GTA series.
3,091

edits