13,618
edits
Talk:Content Changes: Difference between revisions
→Page renaming: Reply
(explained my proposal) |
(→Page renaming: Reply) |
||
| Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
What I mean with my proposal is that one article covers content that was cut from the final product while the other one discusses non-cut changes to the final product like name changes and new additions.--[[User:MrLanceVanceDance|MrLanceVanceDance]] 03:17, 28 September 2011 (BST) | What I mean with my proposal is that one article covers content that was cut from the final product while the other one discusses non-cut changes to the final product like name changes and new additions.--[[User:MrLanceVanceDance|MrLanceVanceDance]] 03:17, 28 September 2011 (BST) | ||
:Yes I understand, but I don't think that would be a good way to split the article. Why would someone only care about content that was completely removed, and not care about content that was altered/replaced? Surely people reading this article would be interested in any content that (for whatever reason) isn't in the copy of the game they have, so they'd have to read both pages anyway. I still think [[Changed Content]] covers everything and makes a sensible page. [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 03:30, 28 September 2011 (BST) | |||
==K9 dog in IV== | ==K9 dog in IV== | ||
Im just wondering is there any proof of the K9 dog for the LCPD? | Im just wondering is there any proof of the K9 dog for the LCPD? | ||