Talk:Content Changes: Difference between revisions

Talk:Content Changes (view source)

807 bytes added , 29 September 2011

13,618

edits

@@ Line 128: / Line 128: @@
 ::I agree with Spaceeinstein. While I agree entirely that cut content and altered content are related and should share an article, there ''is'' a difference between content that was never seen  (or at least never seen as originally intended), and content that was different between two versions of the game. '''[[User:JFletcher|JFletcher]]<sup>''[[User talk:JFletcher|Talk]]''</sup>''' <small>(formerly User:Biggest gta fan ever)</small> 01:59, 29 September 2011 (BST)
+:::I agree that is where the split should be made (if we make one), but I just want to be sure about whether we really need a whole new set of pages about post-release changes. I personally think most people who want to read about one would be interested in the other, and would be happy to see them on the same page. I think this page is good for both of those things. Are they so different that have to be separated? I think sub-pages like [[Changed Content in GTA San Andreas]] could easily cover (by different sub-headings perhaps) things planned (that were never implemented), changed from beta to release, and changed after v1 release (Hot Coffee etc). Or do you think we would be better having both a [[Changed Content in GTA San Andreas]] and a [[Version Differences in GTA San Andreas]] article?
 ==K9 dog in IV==
 Im just wondering is there any proof of the K9 dog for the LCPD?