Talk:GTA V Era: Difference between revisions

Talk:GTA V Era (view source)

Revision as of 22:38, 5 November 2011

153 bytes removed , 5 November 2011

m

no edit summary

VisualWikitext

Loadingue

Members, Administrators

3,091

edits

Revision as of 22:37, 5 November 2011 (view source) Loadingue (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:38, 5 November 2011 (view source) Loadingue (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 15:		Line 15:
	:I agree with Gboyers, as every other game in the franchise with a new number begins a new era, we should assume the same pattern continues with future GTA games unless anything changes. It would be quite confusing if Rockstar classed GTA V as a title existing in the GTA IV era, and then release a totally new era later on, also named GTA V. They cannot just name the new era GTA VI, as that would lose the chronology of era numbers, 1,2,3,4,6. Does this make sense to anyone? Or is the point I am trying to put across unclear.--[[User:Montario\|Montario]] ([[User talk:Montario\|talk]]) 22:03, 5 November 2011 (GMT)		:I agree with Gboyers, as every other game in the franchise with a new number begins a new era, we should assume the same pattern continues with future GTA games unless anything changes. It would be quite confusing if Rockstar classed GTA V as a title existing in the GTA IV era, and then release a totally new era later on, also named GTA V. They cannot just name the new era GTA VI, as that would lose the chronology of era numbers, 1,2,3,4,6. Does this make sense to anyone? Or is the point I am trying to put across unclear.--[[User:Montario\|Montario]] ([[User talk:Montario\|talk]]) 22:03, 5 November 2011 (GMT)

	::My opinion (which isn't really needed): it's the same era than GTA IV. You say that 99% of the brands are new, but even if that's 99%, it's the only the 99% from the trailer. And don't forget all the vehicle brands, we have 12 of them from GTA IV that are confirmed to be in GTA V. Also, Rockstar wouldn't show us dozens of characters from IV in their trailer, otherwise it would be so much cannon that it would be non-cannon, if you know what I mean~~. Also, remember the Las Venturas Poker Challenge on TV, you could see footage from GTA San Andreas in it, while it is confirmed it can't in the same era~~. So I say: GTA V should be considered as part of the GTA IV era, as long as it's not proven it's not. From my point of view, we have many clues that indicate both games are in the same era, and nothing to indicate they're not.--[[User:Loadingue\|Loadingue]] ([[User talk:Loadingue\|talk]]) 22:37, 5 November 2011 (GMT)		::My opinion (which isn't really needed): it's the same era than GTA IV. You say that 99% of the brands are new, but even if that's 99%, it's the only the 99% from the trailer. And don't forget all the vehicle brands, we have 12 of them from GTA IV that are confirmed to be in GTA V. Also, Rockstar wouldn't show us dozens of characters from IV in their trailer, otherwise it would be so much cannon that it would be non-cannon, if you know what I mean. So I say: GTA V should be considered as part of the GTA IV era, as long as it's not proven it's not. From my point of view, we have many clues that indicate both games are in the same era, and nothing to indicate they're not.--[[User:Loadingue\|Loadingue]] ([[User talk:Loadingue\|talk]]) 22:37, 5 November 2011 (GMT)