Community:Promotion/MrLanceVanceDance: Difference between revisions

→‎Comments by User:JFletcher: And I'm the one who's already staff?!
(→‎Comments by User:JFletcher: And I'm the one who's already staff?!)
Line 68: Line 68:
Yes, I am up to the challenge of being an Inspector of this Wiki.--[[User:MrLanceVanceDance|MrLanceVanceDance]] 07:15, 10 August 2011 (BST)
Yes, I am up to the challenge of being an Inspector of this Wiki.--[[User:MrLanceVanceDance|MrLanceVanceDance]] 07:15, 10 August 2011 (BST)


==Comments by [[User:JFletcher]]==
===Comments by [[User:JFletcher]]===
I agree with the general flow of the discussion so far. MrLVD is a dedicated editor, who's edits are usually of a high quality, and who has contributed alot of content to the wiki. I have been considering this user for a staff position for a long time; and I previously assigned him the trusted user flag. MrLVD, If you have noticed that I revert some of your edits more often than I do other users, its not because I think that you're a ''bad'' user - In fact, its quite the opposite: As I have been considering you for a staff position, I have been watching alot of your edits. However, I agree with Montario that this user needs to consider why someone has reverted his edits. This is as simple as reading the edit summary. If he disagrees with the revert, then he should discuss it, rather than simply change it back.
I agree with the general flow of the discussion so far. MrLVD is a dedicated editor, who's edits are usually of a high quality, and who has contributed alot of content to the wiki. I have been considering this user for a staff position for a long time; and I previously assigned him the trusted user flag. MrLVD, If you have noticed that I revert some of your edits more often than I do other users, its not because I think that you're a ''bad'' user - In fact, its quite the opposite: As I have been considering you for a staff position, I have been watching alot of your edits. However, I agree with Montario that this user needs to consider why someone has reverted his edits. This is as simple as reading the edit summary. If he disagrees with the revert, then he should discuss it, rather than simply change it back.