Talk:Red Dead Redemption: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:As I said above: "in GTA Vice City, there are billboards that say "Move over Miami!" The cities don't replace their real-life counterparts." Nowhere it is stated wether or not GTA IV and RDR take place in the same universe, but the games both are quite alike and deserve as much reason to be here as [[Bully]] and [[Manhunt]], of which I can't see why they do deserve their own articles and RDR doesn't. The games' locations are seen/mentioned in GTA IV, yes, but the games aren't. They're just both made by Rockstar and they like to put easter eggs in their games. Does anybody still have an argument against this? -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] 06:52, July 2, 2010 (UTC) | :As I said above: "in GTA Vice City, there are billboards that say "Move over Miami!" The cities don't replace their real-life counterparts." Nowhere it is stated wether or not GTA IV and RDR take place in the same universe, but the games both are quite alike and deserve as much reason to be here as [[Bully]] and [[Manhunt]], of which I can't see why they do deserve their own articles and RDR doesn't. The games' locations are seen/mentioned in GTA IV, yes, but the games aren't. They're just both made by Rockstar and they like to put easter eggs in their games. Does anybody still have an argument against this? -- [[User:Master Sima Yi|Master Sima Yi]] 06:52, July 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Would like to explicitly state before I take further part in this discussion, the only reason I can see why Red Dead Redemption doesn't deserve it's own article is because it has it's own wikia. However, so does Bully and Manhunt; as stated above my post. Both Manhunt and Bully have articles, and Red Dead Redemption's gameplay is entirely based on the Grand Theft Auto basics. That alone should merit it an honorable nod on the GTA wikia. | :Would like to explicitly state before I take further part in this discussion, the only reason I can see why Red Dead Redemption doesn't deserve it's own article is because it has it's own wikia. However, so does Bully and Manhunt; as stated above my post. Both Manhunt and Bully have articles, and Red Dead Redemption's gameplay is entirely based on the Grand Theft Auto basics. That alone should merit it an honorable nod on the GTA wikia. [[User:D16x|D16x]] 07:25, July 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Both [[Manhunt]] and [[Bully]] take place in the same Universe as GTA as there are numerous easter eggs throught the games which prove this. There are no refrences to RDR in the GTA universe so there is no need for the page, pretty simple. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 07:29, July 2, 2010 (UTC) | ::Both [[Manhunt]] and [[Bully]] take place in the same Universe as GTA as there are numerous easter eggs throught the games which prove this. There are no refrences to RDR in the GTA universe so there is no need for the page, pretty simple. '''''[[User:Chimpso|Chimpso]]''''' ([[User Talk:Chimpso|Talk]]) 07:29, July 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::The only references in the game are very vague and more so developer easter eggs, "50 bank robberies" and the supposed cemetery appearing in San Andreas. I wouldn't say they're not in the same universe, more so they're in the same universe, seperate dimensions. I doubt Red Dead Redemption was even much of a thought while GTA4 was being developed. Anyway, I'm pretty neutral on the subject, but I do believe there should be more research on everyone's part if anyone's going to push or pull in either direction. Rockstar weaves a tangled web. Mostly only dropped in to point out the easter egg in Red Dead Redemption that referenced GTA, because I thought it was cool and haven't seen anyone ever mention it.[[User:D16x|D16x]] 07:55, July 2, 2010 (UTC) | |||