Members, Trusted Users
896
edits
User talk:Tommy-Vercetti: Difference between revisions
→RE:No
(→RE:No: New discussion) |
(→RE:No) |
||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
Hi- Calm down, if you disagree with an edit I made, you can discuss it before you start trying to flame at me. No, I was not trying to fill the whole wiki with 'British Spellings', I was just trying to balance the spellings out, like I was once told to do by an administrator on this wiki. That edit you made wasn't really needed, however the newer edits you did made sense, which I re-added for you. --[[User:Montario|Montario]] ([[User talk:Montario|talk]]) 21:39, 1 February 2012 (UTC) | Hi- Calm down, if you disagree with an edit I made, you can discuss it before you start trying to flame at me. No, I was not trying to fill the whole wiki with 'British Spellings', I was just trying to balance the spellings out, like I was once told to do by an administrator on this wiki. That edit you made wasn't really needed, however the newer edits you did made sense, which I re-added for you. --[[User:Montario|Montario]] ([[User talk:Montario|talk]]) 21:39, 1 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
:I am not going to start an immature argument - I understand your idea of 'consistency', I am not an 'idiot', I am not complaining, I am just doing what I have once seen from an administrator on this wiki. It will not look 'tacky' as long as the use of spelling is consistent on one page. However I am not going to do anything with your reverting, you seem to be the one that is complaining not me. You could have easily reverted my edits and gave a simple reason in the edit summary, not spend your time writing writing a whole paragraph to try and--[[User:Montario|Montario]] ([[User talk:Montario|talk]]) 21:59, 1 February 2012 (UTC) insult me. | |||