Jump to content

Talk:Australian Classification Board

Latest comment: 25 July 2008 by Eganio in topic possible Expansion

Deletion Propolsal

This is what the Australia page seems to be about but in less detail, so I propose merging the 2 articles, please explain why this is proposed to be deleted and I might think otherwise. Biggest gta fan ever 09:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge

I removed the {{prod}} template and replaced it with the {{merge}} template, as 1) this information is certainly worth keeping on a wiki dedicated to a video game series, and 2) there already exists an article (OFLC) for this ratings system on the wiki. EganioTalk 09:22, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Even better, I didn't notice that other page. Biggest gta fan ever 09:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
As an Aussie, perhaps you might want to tackle the merge??? :-) EganioTalk 09:44, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Definently, I will have a read through both pages to see what I can do, and have a read of exactly how to merge (besides the obvious. Biggest gta fan ever 09:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
LOL, I saw the lost image, went and grabbed it, came back, it was there. Biggest gta fan ever 10:15, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

possible Expansion

The ratings do go on past MA 15+ into R 18 + and X 18+. These are not used for video games but the heading of the section is "Film and Video Game Ratings" Please say if the info could be added or the name changed or if nothing is required. As an Australian I would be happy to add the info of the other 2 ratings if you's agree. Biggest gta fan ever 09:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead and add the info. More information is better than less, as I see it. Besides, these ratings may very well be used in the future for video games. Also, as you mentioned, the heading is broad, so all information pertaining thereto can and should be included, in my opinion. EganioTalk 10:22, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

New name

Because the OFLC is now known as the Australian Classifacation Board, would it be a good idea to change the anme of the article. I have already made an edit to refleect this change, but I think the article needs to be renamed accordingly.