392
edits
Talk:Uni-Tel: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
(Sigh) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
:::::Sorry, but I don't believe you because you just made it clear, ''yet again'', that you're making only a half-hearted attempt to understand my argument and still don't comprehend it; by suggesting that I consider a two-sentence article about an insignificant, inaccessible and completely unremarkable building to be equal in importance with articles about an entire city and the differences between each iteration of it. This is an absurdly poor comparison (in fact, there ''is'' no comparison) and only serves to prove you're not taking anything I say seriously. I suspect you simply decided that I'm advocating harsh, Wikipedia-esque practices of deleting things on the flimsiest of justification even if they're useful (which is ''not at all'' what I'm trying to achieve), but I suppose it's too late to change your opinion of me now.<br> | :::::Sorry, but I don't believe you because you just made it clear, ''yet again'', that you're making only a half-hearted attempt to understand my argument and still don't comprehend it; by suggesting that I consider a two-sentence article about an insignificant, inaccessible and completely unremarkable building to be equal in importance with articles about an entire city and the differences between each iteration of it. This is an absurdly poor comparison (in fact, there ''is'' no comparison) and only serves to prove you're not taking anything I say seriously. I suspect you simply decided that I'm advocating harsh, Wikipedia-esque practices of deleting things on the flimsiest of justification even if they're useful (which is ''not at all'' what I'm trying to achieve), but I suppose it's too late to change your opinion of me now.<br> | ||
:::::Look, all I ask is this: put aside whatever prejudice you may have about my opinion, try to keep an open mind, and carefully review everything I've said; as you apparently still don't understand what I'm trying to say and have consistently failed to respond with anything but defensive rhetoric like the travel agency = Liberty City argument. Just to make it easy, I'll re-state my point. The line that divides notable content from pointless content is a fine one, but it has to be drawn somewhere (and already is, even here), and I simply feel it should be drawn just above articles ''like'' this one (not ''just'' this one), which serve no informative or practical purpose. --[[User:MattyDienhoff|MattyDienhoff]] 14:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | :::::Look, all I ask is this: put aside whatever prejudice you may have about my opinion, try to keep an open mind, and carefully review everything I've said; as you apparently still don't understand what I'm trying to say and have consistently failed to respond with anything but defensive rhetoric like the travel agency = Liberty City argument. Just to make it easy, I'll re-state my point. The line that divides <s>notable</s> useful content from pointless content is a fine one, but it has to be drawn somewhere (and already is, even here), and I simply feel it should be drawn just above articles ''like'' this one (not ''just'' this one), which serve no informative or practical purpose. --[[User:MattyDienhoff|MattyDienhoff]] 14:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC) | ||