13,612
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::So here we go again. "It's clear" - it is very subjective, but as a person with ability to suspend other users you must be objective, usually it is supposed to be a main responsibility of a moderator. If you are not objective, then you shouldn't have rights to judge other people in the first place. As for those Abuse Filter logs - I don't see how it is an evidence or can prove anything. Indeed, I did try to add a link to that site as it would contribute to the article and when I was denied, I decided I should contribute to wiki first and that would be even better, as I do care about this website's community. Here I am being subjective, but I am not a mod myself so it is okay to be so as a regular user, but I honestly believe those changes I made were better for those articles, as they made sentences sound more "fluid". And please explain, how is it forbidden to add external links, as that exact page already has at least two external links? Well, even that subsection is called "external links", and I guess "external" here stands for a reason. [[User:ReiV|ReiV]] ([[User talk:ReiV|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/ReiV|edits]]) 12:21, 8 April 2015 (BST) | :::So here we go again. "It's clear" - it is very subjective, but as a person with ability to suspend other users you must be objective, usually it is supposed to be a main responsibility of a moderator. If you are not objective, then you shouldn't have rights to judge other people in the first place. As for those Abuse Filter logs - I don't see how it is an evidence or can prove anything. Indeed, I did try to add a link to that site as it would contribute to the article and when I was denied, I decided I should contribute to wiki first and that would be even better, as I do care about this website's community. Here I am being subjective, but I am not a mod myself so it is okay to be so as a regular user, but I honestly believe those changes I made were better for those articles, as they made sentences sound more "fluid". And please explain, how is it forbidden to add external links, as that exact page already has at least two external links? Well, even that subsection is called "external links", and I guess "external" here stands for a reason. [[User:ReiV|ReiV]] ([[User talk:ReiV|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/ReiV|edits]]) 12:21, 8 April 2015 (BST) | ||
Yes, I have to make an objective interpretation of your actions based on the evidence. Evidence such as: | |||
*You making these edits [http://www.grandtheftwiki.com/index.php?title=Grand_Theft_Auto_IV&diff=prev&oldid=413585] [http://www.grandtheftwiki.com/index.php?title=Completion_in_GTA_IV&diff=prev&oldid=413586] [http://www.grandtheftwiki.com/index.php?title=QUB3D&diff=prev&oldid=413587] which are not significant contributions, making no meaningful or positive change to the page, and I believe their only purpose was to bypass the new-users-cant-add-links restriction that we have | |||
*You ignoring my request not to add links, and re-adding your link | |||
*Your username actively posting this same link in many other places on the Internet (some inappropriately) [http://mafro.ca/forums/index.php?action=profile;u=75;area=showposts;sa=topics] [http://www.gtahub.com/threads/where-to-find-a-nice-decent-gta-4-mods-database-site.3935/] [http://gtat.dracoblue.net/index.php?action=profile;u=148816;sa=showPosts] [http://gta5online.com/forum/online/a-big-mods-warehouse-at-gtaall-com/#p288] [http://forums.mfgg.net/viewtopic.php?p=435764#p435764] | |||
The external links in major pages are only for official sites plus Wikipedia - we do not want to have a link for every single fan-site that exists, and it would not be fair to allow one but not others. | |||
You will notice that I have not blocked you, I just removed the links and asked you not to add them again, whilst inviting you to continue editing here. I think that is fair. [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 12:45, 8 April 2015 (BST) |
edits