24
edits
User talk:ReiV: Difference between revisions
→Spamming links
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
You will notice that I have not blocked you, I just removed the links and asked you not to add them again, whilst inviting you to continue editing here. I think that is fair. [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 12:45, 8 April 2015 (BST) | You will notice that I have not blocked you, I just removed the links and asked you not to add them again, whilst inviting you to continue editing here. I think that is fair. [[User:Gboyers|gboyers]] <sup>[[User_talk:Gboyers|talk]]</sup> 12:45, 8 April 2015 (BST) | ||
: Those edits are indeed not significant objectively-talking, but in my opinion they are nice. I believe so. I didn't ignore your request, as you haven't made one prior to my action. As for username, well, they were made after I made that edit, so my theory would be is that someone is trying to blackmail me, probably that was your evil masterplan to post that link all over Internet to portray me as a bad person, but I have no evidence for that (just like you don't have evidence for me and that guy posting those link to be the same person). Or it can be just a pure concidence. Whatever it is, something which happens on a completely separate website is a different matter and has nothing to do with this Wikipedia (i.e. other sites are not under the jurisdiction of your website and vice-versa). I've re-read the rules of your website and I don't see how am I violating something, as officiality is a (this word again) subjective concept without a clear definition, and furthermore, it is never stated is it official... relatively to what? Then, why is Wikipedia allowed? It is has nothing to do with Rockstar, it is edited by entirely random people (one don't even have to sign up, like here) and has absolutely no legal connection to the word "official". Thereofe, Wikipedia must removed from external links as well. | |||
: With those "evidences" you are trying to lurk me into somekind of paralogism trap, bifurcation so-to-say, as those "evidences" don't... evidence anything. | |||