User talk:Hardrock182: Difference between revisions

Don't worry about it, I can understand that it took you some time to create that article, however, the article (and all of its content) can easily be restored if it turns out that the article ''is'' necessary - so all the time you spent creating it hasn't really gone to waste. If you think an article of that type may be required for something else, or if you just have an idea for a different sort of article at any point in the future, I suggest that you discuss it first - that way we can all come an agreement as to whether or not it is necessary. One last thing, while, you ''were'' being considerate by removing the swearing from your comment, that's not normally seen as a good thing - regardless of your ''actual'' intentions, it may be seen as an attempt to make yourself look like a better person, and also makes the first half of my response to you seem a bit random and unnecessary. Depending on the circumstances, that can also be a blockable offense, although, in this case, it isn't. Nevertheless, I'm sorry to say, but I had to revert the edits you made to your comment - it's nothing personal, it's just for the sake of this discussion. - [[User:Hardrock182|Hardrock182]] 11:59, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, hardrock182.--[[User:Olivercooke|Olivercooke]] 17:36, October 19, 2009